the wining team delusion!

[rockandroll]

Dont change the wining team, yes play vine and co even if they are still far from their form, yeah simpson vine is the solution etc... !
that was some extract from some posts of the forumers here, I had insisted that the team had a good run not because we were strong ! but with little bit of luck and poor sides confronted. the JM coaching is so open to everybody, so static that sousa knew how to beat it. what JM's errors actualy:
1- the first sub enter only after we conceed a goal!
2- he didnt rotate the team and he knew well that even real madrid rotate team or even an amateur coach would rotate the team mainly we are not playing every weekend but every 3 DAYS! I dnt see any player in the world could perform even 60% in a such tight schedule..

today at least 5 fresh players should have started the game.
we will never make any playoff if he didnt realise this simple rules of football.
:cry:

[Quaz]

5 fresh players.....even if they are below standard on the pitch....no thanks prefer consistancy as far as team selection......2 sending offs cost us dear.....

[pkloft]

Dont change the wining team, yes play vine and co even if they are still far from their form, yeah simpson vine is the solution etc... !
that was some extract from some posts of the forumers here, I had insisted that the team had a good run not because we were strong ! but with little bit of luck and poor sides confronted. the JM coaching is so open to everybody, so static that sousa knew how to beat it. what JM's errors actualy:
1- the first sub enter only after we conceed a goal!
2- he didnt rotate the team and he knew well that even real madrid rotate team or even an amateur coach would rotate the team mainly we are not playing every weekend but every 3 DAYS! I dnt see any player in the world could perform even 60% in a such tight schedule..

today at least 5 fresh players should have started the game.
we will never make any playoff if he didnt realise this simple rules of football.
:cry:

are you serious man :shocked::horror::amazing:

5 fresh players.....even if they are below standard on the pitch....no thanks prefer consistancy as far as team selection......2 sending offs cost us dear.....

make you right there Quaz, and of course the lack of a deadly finisher

[Quaz]

are you serious man :shocked::horror::amazing:



make you right there Quaz, and of course the lack of a deadly finisher

that as well mate.....but everyone knew sousa's tactics so why they are surprised and moaning i aint got a clue

[qblockpete]

We should maybe have played 3 at the back and matched them with 5 in midfield, but making 5 changes would have been way over the top.

Sending off changed the game, simple

[QPRMendoza]

At the end of the day all that matters is who got the chocolates. We got none they got three. Simple. If we had got 4 points from Newcastle and Swansea I would have been very happy. If we got two content. One suggests mid table finish. Just my opinion.

[rockandroll]

We should maybe have played 3 at the back and matched them with 5 in midfield, but making 5 changes would have been way over the top.

Sending off changed the game, simple

you know last year I read oone article about some players on the premiere league, it said that some player when they want to take rest they make stupid mistakes to get red cards! and in my opinion the players who got the cards today were looking for it. they were afraid to look crap on the field so they prefer to get off in their own way. as simple as that.

[Rebel R's]

At the end of the day all that matters is who got the chocolates. We got none they got three. Simple. If we had got 4 points from Newcastle and Swansea I would have been very happy. If we got two content. One suggests mid table finish. Just my opinion.

an opinion that wont go down well with most on this board,because its not positive

[QPRMendoza]

an opinion that wont go down well with most on this board,because its not positive

Sorry :shame:

[Rebel R's]

Sorry :shame:

im sorry,because i was being sarcastic,i agree.

[THE FLYING COW]

well

well jim is in a no win situation if he plays a heavily changed side he gets called the tinkerman
so he did what i thought was the correct thing and he gets criticised for losing