Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bournemouth to bid £14 million for Austin

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by Ryan8947 View Post
    I agree I'd take that, but I'd prefer Jerome. Can stretch defences and not a bad finisher.
    Agree, but seems to me Jerome is first choice striker, whereas Hooper has been playing a bit part, therefore making him more 'gettable'

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Jimmy Rabbit View Post
      This. I like Hooper. Needs game time. A good finisher. I'd be happy if we got someone of his calibre.
      Hooper would be a good replacement. Given game time he's a 15-20 goal a season forward at this level. Got 12 last season but came off the bench for half the games he played in

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Shepherds Mush View Post
        Hooper would be a good replacement. Given game time he's a 15-20 goal a season forward at this level. Got 12 last season but came off the bench for half the games he played in
        Exactly mate. Got a good career ratio / record.

        Comment


        • #64
          Im not massive fan of hooper but would not turn my nose up. He is however not 5mil of the deal 3mil at a push

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Jimmy Rabbit View Post
            Agree, but seems to me Jerome is first choice striker, whereas Hooper has been playing a bit part, therefore making him more 'gettable'
            Yeah, fair enough. If i'm honest I'd take either.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by West Acton View Post
              Im not massive fan of hooper but would not turn my nose up. He is however not 5mil of the deal 3mil at a push
              Absolutely this.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by West Acton View Post
                Im not massive fan of hooper but would not turn my nose up. He is however not 5mil of the deal 3mil at a push
                Yeah..12+ Hooper would do for me.

                Comment


                • #68
                  [QUOTE=MattyRangers;1433491]The failed medical at Hull was due to him having had a knee op when he was 14 or so. His injury in our promotion season was his shoulder & totally unrelated.
                  QUOTE]

                  This was my reaction when I read this earlier today, which again highlights lazy journalism.

                  As for their bid, that should flatly be rejected.
                  £15M imo is too cheap anyway, so accepting less is an absolute no.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    I'd take the offer . Big money off the wage bill and even if the board pocket the 4 million outlay we would in theory have an additional 10 million quid in the pot to spend . That could bring in a couple of very good players at this level and gives us a month to bring them in . Throw in a buy back clause if the clubs swap places next year . Job done IMHO

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by West Acton View Post
                      hooper
                      not for me

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        £15mil plus add ons for goals and international appearances to take it up closer to the £20mil mark would be a very very good deal for us.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Shepherds Mush View Post
                          Yeah..12+ Hooper would do for me.
                          Hooper is a funny one. Looked like he had the potential to kick on and be a top class striker but his career has really stalled at Norwich, hasn't really done well consistently for them either in the Prem or the Championship. Probably also comes with fairly hefty wage demands.

                          Maybe he just needs a move to get his career back on track or maybe his best days are already behind him. Would certainly be a punt either way!

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Problem is to get any of these players as a swap we need 1) Charlie to want to join the team 2) The player to want to join us. I think this would be difficult.

                            I'd love one of the Palace forwards though: Gayle, Campbell or even Murray for an increased fee

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Could we ask for say 10m and Callum Wilson?
                              By the way that was muted along time ago QPR would except £+ Murray from Palace but apparently it was money plus Gayle that was on offer , then again you know this rumours ?

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by winalotto View Post
                                Could we ask for say 10m and Callum Wilson?
                                By the way that was muted along time ago QPR would except £+ Murray from Palace but apparently it was money plus Gayle that was on offer , then again you know this rumours ?
                                Doubt either Bournemouth or Wilson want him going anywhere

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X