Originally posted by dsqpr
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Austin Auction begins...
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by stainrodisalegend View PostGreat memories with Johnny Spencer, agreed there. I just don't think the club is looking to buy a like for like replacement. Think club's agenda is ask 15m, prob settle for 12 or maybe 10 with some add ons, then spend a couple of million on a lower league striker. Our days of writing big cheques are over for now at least imho.
Comment
-
... or does it?
Charlie Austin fears £15m price-tag is putting off potential buyers
- Queens Park Rangers goalscorer will plead with club bosses to cut his transfer fee as he fears being priced out of a move from relegated Londoners
Comment
-
Originally posted by klonk View Post... or does it?
Charlie Austin fears £15m price-tag is putting off potential buyers
- Queens Park Rangers goalscorer will plead with club bosses to cut his transfer fee as he fears being priced out of a move from relegated Londoners
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/foo...al-buyers.html
Comment
-
Originally posted by klonk View Post... or does it?
Charlie Austin fears £15m price-tag is putting off potential buyers
- Queens Park Rangers goalscorer will plead with club bosses to cut his transfer fee as he fears being priced out of a move from relegated Londoners
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/foo...al-buyers.html
Comment
-
Can't imagine Charlie pleading to us for a second. Usual made up paper talk with no substance.
I think the thing to do now is to give him and any potential new club a week to agree a deal that meets our valuation or he stays. Quite simple really.
We should be grateful for what he has done for us, but we don't owe him anything. Same as he should be grateful to us for what we have done for his career, when others weren't prepared to. He owes us nothing either, other than to see out his contract or move to a club he finds acceptable, provided they meet our asking price. We had to meet Burnley's after all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by brightonr View PostCan't imagine Charlie pleading to us for a second. Usual made up paper talk with no substance.
I think the thing to do now is to give him and any potential new club a week to agree a deal that meets our valuation or he stays. Quite simple really.
We should be grateful for what he has done for us, but we don't owe him anything. Same as he should be grateful to us for what we have done for his career, when others weren't prepared to. He owes us nothing either, other than to see out his contract or move to a club he finds acceptable, provided they meet our asking price. We had to meet Burnley's after all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jimmy Rabbit View PostRemy got sold a day before the window closed. He'll go. And he'll go for what we want, not what him, his agent or any other football club wants him to go for.
We call the shots for once on this one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jimmy Rabbit View PostRemy got sold a day before the window closed. He'll go. And he'll go for what we want, not what him, his agent or any other football club wants him to go for.
We call the shots for once on this one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jimmy Rabbit View PostRemy got sold a day before the window closed. He'll go. And he'll go for what we want, not what him, his agent or any other football club wants him to go for.
We call the shots for once on this one.Ooh northern lads love gravy
Comment
-
With all due respect Van Burnley would of desperately needed that cash. We don't. FFP or not our owners are minted and we have learned a lot from getting burnt fingers the last few years. The last thing they'll do is sell our prize asset for under our valuation. Just won't happen.
Charlie will want to go, fair enough. It can be argued he's earned his right to top flight football, but NOT at our expense. If he goes, it's at our price. I'm sure Les would of made that perfectly clear to him and his agent and any potential suitors.
Comment
-
With only Sergio Aguero, Harry Kane and Diego Costa ahead of Austin in last season’s Premier League scoring chart, QPR believe their valuation of Austin is fair.
Aguero, Kane and Costa would all fetch well over £30m, while Aston Villa are demanding £32.5m for Christian Benteke, who scored five fewer goals than Austin.
If Benteke is worth £32.5m then Charlie is worth a helluva lot more than £15m!
The other teams have us pegged as mugs and are now just playing the usual negotiating game, pretending they don't really want an 18 goal scorer and the price is too high anyway. We finally seem to be playing a decent game ourselves and just sitting tight while they posture - when we know very well that everybody very much wants to add an 18 goal scorer to their team! We need to stay the course and we will get a fair price for Charlie - or his goals next season, it matters not.
And if Charlie really wants to go, and I believe he does, then all he needs to do is sign a new multi-year contract. This would not only at least double his wages for the next year in case we can't work out a deal (assuming we are willing to pay him what he is now worth) but would also instantly increase his PRICE in the transfer market, making it much more likely that we will get our valuation for him this summer and he will get the move he wants. The new contract could include a release clause for £15m (plus whatever add-ons we want, and there ought to be some rather significant ones!) but it would need to be active only until about mid-July, to make sure we don't get stuck in another Remy-like situation. Then it would be up to him and his agent to get him a move.Last edited by dsqpr; 25-06-2015, 06:58 AM.'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.
Comment
Comment