Originally posted by QprQpr
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Matt Lowton..
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Tarbie View PostAll the other teams that changed manager did it before or during the transfer window and improved their squads in January.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QprQpr View PostSo your passing the blame Fernándes now. On paper our squad was strong enough to stay up. Our problem was the two shite managers we had leading the team.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tarbie View PostFair enough. But the fact remains that the damage was done far before Ramsey took charge. In my opinion Ramsey deserves a chance to prove himself with his own squad and I really don't see the point of getting on his back based on less than 20 games last season.
I also don't buy into the point the Wealdstone Raider was making that Paul Clement would have been a far superior appointment than Ramsey. Both are unknown quantities and both could go either way. For the record I would have gladly had Clement here. By the same token I'm not disappointed by the appointment of Ramsey permanently.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tarbie View PostWasn't blaming anyone but if we have to apportion blame I think you need to look at Harry and the board before Ramsey. Clearly we probably won't agree on this but I think the approach we have going into this season is a lot more positive and sensible for a club or our size than any of the 4 previous seasons under Fernandes!
I'd be interested to hear what you think the pros and cons of his appointment was as I'm really struggling to find 1 pro for his appointment right now
Comment
-
Originally posted by QprQpr View PostI'm not questioning our approach to signings etc. My issue is why ramsey was given the job in the first place. He had a worse record than redknapp and sent us down no two ways about that.
I'd be interested to hear what you think the pros and cons of his appointment was as I'm really struggling to find 1 pro for his appointment right now
1.) He has had the respect of the whole squad from day one (if you believe what you read). This is something that Harry & Hughes never managed to achieve (again, if you believe what you read).
2.) He tries to play good football.
3.) He's not afraid to drop big names in favour of younger players if he thinks that is what is required.
4.) He has gone on record a number of times saying that he is looking to develop younger players and improve them. This is is something that Harry was neither interested in, or capable of.
5.) He's very well respected in the coaching world.
6.) This one is personal to me. I like the bloke and think he speaks a lot of sense.
7.) He has something to prove.
Of course there are a healthy amount of cons too but I'd still take Ramsey over a lot of the established managers that we could have attracted.
Comment
-
Regarding point 2, we definitely played better football under Ramsey than we ever did under Redknapp. Our problem was a p!ss poor defence. Agree with the rest Tarbie.Top Scorers 2018/2019
Nakhi Wells - 8
Pawel Wszolek - 6
Luke Freeman - 6
Matt Smith - 6
Ebere Eze - 4
Joel Lynch - 3
Tomer Hemed - 3
Toni Leistner - 2
Massimo Luongo- 2
Angel Rangel - 2
Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
Geoff Cameron - 1
Aramide Oteh - 1
Jake Bidwell - 1
Jordan Cousins - 1
Summer Transfers 2019
IN
OUT
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tarbie View PostOk, my pro's for Ramsey are as follows:
1.) He has had the respect of the whole squad from day one (if you believe what you read). This is something that Harry & Hughes never managed to achieve (again, if you believe what you read).
2.) He tries to play good football.
3.) He's not afraid to drop big names in favour of younger players if he thinks that is what is required.
4.) He has gone on record a number of times saying that he is looking to develop younger players and improve them. This is is something that Harry was neither interested in, or capable of.
5.) He's very well respected in the coaching world.
6.) This one is personal to me. I like the bloke and think he speaks a lot of sense.
7.) He has something to prove.
Of course there are a healthy amount of cons too but I'd still take Ramsey over a lot of the established managers that we could have attracted.
1 is invalid anyway as unless your a player in the team how would you know whether his respected or not? The fact that certain players refused to play for him tells me he isn't respected.
I take your point on the other 2 you listed out of the 7 !
Happy to list his cons but I'd probably exceed the character limit on a post...Last edited by QprQpr; 20-06-2015, 07:09 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QprQpr View Post1, 2, , 5 , 6, 7 are debatable Hiring a manager based on " his a nice bloke " is frankly laughable mate.
1 is invalid anyway as unless your a player in the team how would you know whether his respected or not? The fact that certain players refused to play for him tells me he isn't respected.
I take your point on the other 2 you listed out of the 7 !
Happy to list his cons but I'd probably exceed the character limit on a post...
The one thing that isn't debatable is the fact he is our manager for the foreseeable, he's been given a 3 year contract. In my opinion that means he deserves our backing going into the new season. I'm hopeful that my positive outlook on things isn't misguided and that you and Dogrrs are in for a pleasant surprise!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tarbie View PostIt's all about opinions isn't it mate? I do think your outlook is a bit negative though.
The one thing that isn't debatable is the fact he is our manager for the foreseeable, he's been given a 3 year contract. In my opinion that means he deserves our backing going into the new season. I'm hopeful that my positive outlook on things isn't misguided and that you and Dogrrs are in for a pleasant surprise!
Comment
-
Comment