Yes or no - reported that he wants to stay but with our new 'youth' policy should we re sign him
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Richard Dunne
Collapse
X
-
Yes for me. But as squad player. Should not be thought of as a signing for the first 11. Is more than capable of coming of the bench now and again and shoring things up or playing the odd game.
He also is a fantastic pro and would be a great influence around the club. To me it's important we have 2,3 or possibly 4 of these type of players who have experience and can lead the changing room.
He's not on big wages and we could probably renegotiate a better deal for him to stay as well. But as I said at the top he should be signed as a squad player and we should have 3 capable cb to pick from before him.
Comment
-
Yes.Banning people is no longer my hobby,
but take a look at my photo blog:
http://kirillqpr.blogspot.com/
How and why did I start supporting QPR in Estonia:
http://www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/blog.php?b=852
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Jeems View PostYep. Lets not do a Fulham and rely solely on youth.
Wont be a regular starter but like Clint, will be a good head in the dressing room and more than a dependable back up. 46 games is a long seasonYou should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
-
Superb role model, excellent attitude but I think we should only keep 1 out of Dunney and Hill as a seasoned pro in the squad. Hill maybe just shading it as he can play 2 positions. Could be time for Dunney to be put out to stud. Thank you for everything fella, you are one of a small handful who can hold their head up high.
Comment
Comment