Originally posted by sirles9
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Fernandes has ruined QPR
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by uptheR's View PostAnd that's a bad thing? Not Tony's job to allow or deny certain players, down to managers to identify the players they want, and Tony decides yes or no based on finance. Not TF's fault the managers he employed were such ##### they wasted millions on a load of ####
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View PostTony should know more about players than the experienced veteran been in the game for decades managers yeah. Maybe he could of managed the team as well of thats the case.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sirles9 View PostYou must be about 12. It doesn't take rocket scientist to understand the FFP rules and to realise that a clube of QPR's size can't afford to buy a player who is worth £10 million when the club aren't making any money and is in heaps of debt.
Or do you just want to be happy in your misery?
Comment
-
The funniest part of this is that, when HR and MH were here, people were more than happy to blame them. Once they each went, the blame went to the next person in the chain still at the club. It's like people want to criticise something at the club just because it gives them some level of joy or god knows what. There would be a lot more fretting from the board if things were as bad as the media say they are"What stats allow you to do is not take things at face value. The idea that I trust my eyes more than the stats, I just don't buy that because I've seen magicians pull rabbits out of hats and I know I just know that rabbit's not in there." - Billy Beane
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hitman34 View PostIdont give a fark, as long as the fat useless farker pays out of his own pocket.
After all, it was all his clumsy,stupid doing in the first place.
#pr1ck
Comment
-
Originally posted by sirles9 View PostYou're talking complete rubbish now. The buck stops with Fernandes. Harry Redknapp would've gone to Fernandes and asked to sign Sandro. Fernandes or other members of the board would've entered into negotiations with Tottenham and discovered that they would have to pay up to £10 million for him. If Fernandes had the club's best interests at heart then he could've quite easily have turned around to Redknapp and said we're not signing Sandro because he's far too expensive for the club and that would be that. It's Fernandes who always has the final say on everything at QPR, particularly what the finances, because he's the chairman and majority owner.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sirles9 View PostYou must be about 12. It doesn't take rocket scientist to understand the FFP rules and to realise that a club of QPR's size can't afford to buy a player who is worth £10 million when the club aren't making any money and is in heaps of debt. Tony should be spending what the club can afford - not gambling AGAIN
Can't please everyone all of the time
Comment
-
Originally posted by nasser95 View PostThe funniest part of this is that, when HR and MH were here, people were more than happy to blame them. Once they each went, the blame went to the next person in the chain still at the club. It's like people want to criticise something at the club just because it gives them some level of joy or god knows what. There would be a lot more fretting from the board if things were as bad as the media say they are
Comment
-
Can I just add, we're only now in debt because the money TF has spent on transfers has been completely spunked up te wall by the managers that he employed. If both Hughes and Redknapp had done a better job of scouting and recruiting and building a good squad, which was their jobs that TF also payed them for by the way, then we wouldn't have been relegated 2 years ago, and we wouldn't have been relegated now, therefore we wouldn't be in debt
Comment
-
Originally posted by uptheR's View PostMe talking rubbish? Lets use your example shall we. So Redknapp goes to TF and asks him to sign Sandro. TF trusts the judgement of his manager and gets him his man. How is that a bad thing?? TF knows whether or not he can afford to pay for the deal, it's down to HR to make sure Sandro is fit and is actually what we need. I can't understand how you or anybody else can try to blame TF for that. And if you must know, I don't believe TF is totally blameless, but for you to actually try to make out like TF backing his managers as a bad thing is laughable, and then you tell me I'm talking rubbish. Don't think so mate
Comment
-
Originally posted by sirles9 View PostIt is a bad thing because a club like QPR shouldn't be spending £10 million on a player - especially in our situation!
Comment
-
Originally posted by uptheR's View PostNow who's talking rubbish. In our situation? Which was what? In the premiership trying to survive and maybe even progress. How we supposed to grow without buying supposedly better and therefore more expensive players? Was HR's job to make sure Sandro was fit and able to play, which he wasn't. Not TF's fault
Comment
-
Originally posted by sirles9 View PostIt is a bad thing because a club like QPR shouldn't be spending £10 million on a player - especially in our situation! You don't see Burnley spending that kind of money and that's because they're run responsibly and know what they can afford. A chairman shouldn't be gambling with the club like Fernandes has been. A responsible chairman would spend what the club can afford. If he was a decent leader then he would've turned around to Redknapp and said we're not going down that road again and especially not on a crock who has turned out to have problems with his visa. The man clearly didn't learn from his mistakes
Comment
Comment