Not that it makes any difference now but another example of shocking refereeing decisions. I only saw the highlights on Match of the Day, but to me the whole of the ball did not cross the whole of the goal line to be called out of play and goal disallowed. To me, the ball clearly bounced on the line and the goal should have stood. Commentators said that the goal was rightly disallowed. Did anyone else think this goal should have stood?
I also watched the penalty decision that went against us when Onuaha was penalised for pulling Liverpool player (skrtel) back in the box. Having watched the replay 20 odd times, I'm still not convinced that this was even a foul. Skrtel was setting himself up for an overhead kick therefore was already off balance and falling when Onuaha made minimal contact. This stuff happens at every corner and set piece that gets taken in every game. But it's only us that get penalties awarded against us when we desperately need the points.
This season has been so frustrating, with some undoubtedly poor performances on the field, but I can't help feeling that the luck was just not with QPR this time around. Maybe we used all of our luck in the play-off final last year.
I also watched the penalty decision that went against us when Onuaha was penalised for pulling Liverpool player (skrtel) back in the box. Having watched the replay 20 odd times, I'm still not convinced that this was even a foul. Skrtel was setting himself up for an overhead kick therefore was already off balance and falling when Onuaha made minimal contact. This stuff happens at every corner and set piece that gets taken in every game. But it's only us that get penalties awarded against us when we desperately need the points.
This season has been so frustrating, with some undoubtedly poor performances on the field, but I can't help feeling that the luck was just not with QPR this time around. Maybe we used all of our luck in the play-off final last year.
Comment