If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Next Consultation Phase On Old Oak. Get Involved And Show Your Support.
Looks like this is going ahead which I feel is good news.
Where does it look like that? This ornate spin certainly goes on and on and on, you end up scrolling forever, the structure reminds me of a get-rich-quick website: make a lot of money just sitting on your lazy harris by the computer at home, as featured on Google, CNN and the Plumbing Weekly Magazine.
Essentially all it says is that nothing is decided yet and they need all the support they can get. Which is old news.
Where does it look like that? This ornate spin certainly goes on and on and on, you end up scrolling forever, the structure reminds me of a get-rich-quick website: make a lot of money just sitting on your lazy harris by the computer at home, as featured on Google, CNN and the Plumbing Weekly Magazine.
Essentially all it says is that nothing is decided yet and they need all the support they can get. Which is old news.
I'm actually a little puzzled as to what the purpose of this New Queen's Park consultation page actually is. It gives 3 choices, and asks you to select whichever one (or two, or three) that you agree with. Now the choices essentially are that a) a new ground has to be within West London b) the stadium is to be the first part of the regeneration process and c) the fan's want a new staidum. Now forgive me if I'm wrong, but hadn't this already been established months, if not years ago? I'm certain that Fernandes has stated that he wants a new ground within West London that appeases the fans by the early 2020's for a while now. It's nice that the club wants to keep the fans involved....but it's starting to feel like interaction for the sake of it at present.
Comment