Having read a few of the posts on here over the last few days i am getting the impression that quite a few people are against Sherwood coming in and also that TF and Amit should take responsibility for the terrible appointment of Redknapp.
I have two points to make here....
1) I am not a fan of Redknapp, i have wanted him out since the West Ham game. However, on reflection although our league position is the same as when he joined us and it is hard to identify many improvements he has made in his time in charge, one thing is for sure, he did get rid of all the bad blood in the squad and has left us with a much better squad than Hughes did. Not sure there is any place for criticizing the board on their decision to hire Harry or fire him (if thats what we wish to believe happened in a roundabout way!)
2) If Sherwood gets the role, we should ALL get behind him! I can not see (or have not read any logical reason against) why he would not be a good appointment. Seems a determined character, passionate, something to prove, promotes youth etc, gets on with Les and Ramsey.
I have two points to make here....
1) I am not a fan of Redknapp, i have wanted him out since the West Ham game. However, on reflection although our league position is the same as when he joined us and it is hard to identify many improvements he has made in his time in charge, one thing is for sure, he did get rid of all the bad blood in the squad and has left us with a much better squad than Hughes did. Not sure there is any place for criticizing the board on their decision to hire Harry or fire him (if thats what we wish to believe happened in a roundabout way!)
2) If Sherwood gets the role, we should ALL get behind him! I can not see (or have not read any logical reason against) why he would not be a good appointment. Seems a determined character, passionate, something to prove, promotes youth etc, gets on with Les and Ramsey.
Comment