If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I voted defoe but crouch could effectively do the job that Zamora does to and is a little less injury prone and chips in with more goals. I certainly think we need a stroker with pace and a eye fro goal.
They are only 32. & 33, not bloody 36. Players careers tend to last a little bit longer these days. Players are not finished at 32 or 33, to think they are is just ridiculous .
we need to keep hoilett but get rid of both philips'es.
also get shot of toare and rio and tarrabt.
tie down dunne for another year and austin another 4 years contract.
tempting to offer ravel a contract or a loan with a view to buy at the end of the season.
bring in a right back as ned is shocking in that position. job done.
as for the bus stop and defoe, no farking way.
defoe will be another sandro, be lucky to get 3 games out of him before a tendon snaps.
we need to keep hoilett but get rid of both philips'es.
also get shot of toare and rio and tarrabt.
tie down dunne for another year and austin another 4 years contract.
tempting to offer ravel a contract or a loan with a view to buy at the end of the season.
bring in a right back as ned is shocking in that position. job done.
as for the bus stop and defoe, no farking way.
defoe will be another sandro, be lucky to get 3 games out of him before a tendon snaps.
I cant understand why anyone would want to keep hoilett? He offer nothing what so ever and has failed to deliver on so many occasions. As for Matty phillips why chuck him out when he hasn't had any chance of a run of games. Hes young and we paid 4 mill for him and is just short of confidence. When he came first got in the QPR team after his injury last year he use to get us all up on our feet because he was quick had a decent cross and a ok finish. Unfortuantely he got injured again and has struggled to get back in the team.
I cant understand why anyone would want to keep hoilett? He offer nothing what so ever and has failed to deliver on so many occasions. As for Matty phillips why chuck him out when he hasn't had any chance of a run of games. Hes young and we paid 4 mill for him and is just short of confidence. When he came first got in the QPR team after his injury last year he use to get us all up on our feet because he was quick had a decent cross and a ok finish. Unfortuantely he got injured again and has struggled to get back in the team.
Hoilett has looked dangerous when he's played including yesterday when coming on.
As fo Phillips not getting games..... Did you miss the beginning of the season when he was starting games and fluffing sitters at the likes of Spurs and UTD, and clearly his confidence was then shot???
Neither. I'm a fan of both players but we need to start bringing in younger hungry players.
'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.
Hoilett has looked dangerous when he's played including yesterday when coming on.
As fo Phillips not getting games..... Did you miss the beginning of the season when he was starting games and fluffing sitters at the likes of Spurs and UTD, and clearly his confidence was then shot???
Coming back from injury and stepping up a level in a unsettled team. the whole squad was off the pace. You cant give someone 3 or 4 games and judge their ability off that its ridiculous. He's a young lad who is just short of confidence. Remember him from last year before he got injured and it tokk him 4 or 5 games to settle then him and Austin were our most dangerous players. Difference with Phillips to hoillet is he knows what to do with the ball just needs a bit of time.
Hoilett has been at the club for ages now and played a hell of a lot more than phillips and failed to deliver more times then not. Its all well and good every now and again looking a bit dangerous. But where is the blokes end product. He fails to deliver balls in the box and gives away possession constantly.
How can you make a case for a bloke who constantly puts in poor performances over a sustained period of time?
Comment