Don't see the obsession with Pulis. I for one would be against him as our next manager. He's just the trendy option at the moment because he done well at Palace. Stoke fans pushed him out of their club. I think our next appointment should be long term thinking someone like Howe, McClaren, Clement, Clarke or look abroad and find a pochetinno or koeman
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mutual consent
Collapse
X
-
Where`s this "Pullis is boring" come from?
Harry is about as boring as it gets.
Sure Pullis` teams may not be world beaters but how many "big" teams have they scalped over the years?
He`s a manager that sets his team out to be hard to beat and get in the oppo`s faces, That`s what were crying out for IMO.
There is 31 games left to get it right, Howe, Robinson etc.would have been better for us in the Championship but would be like a fish out of water now, with the state the club is/could be in.
No point looking for a manager for the next 3-4 years, we need one now. (well,we soon will I guess).
Comment
-
Not boring for me just not the stability long term we require.
I'd rather a younger dynamic manager. As competent as Pulis is he's another old skool style manager from what I've seen.
I want someone to come in and turn around our youth set up, buy hard working players who don't want half a million in wages a month & someone who is eager to win things in the game not coming to the twighlight of their careers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jimmy Rabbit View PostNot boring for me just not the stability long term we require.
I'd rather a younger dynamic manager. As competent as Pulis is he's another old skool style manager from what I've seen.
I want someone to come in and turn around our youth set up, buy hard working players who don't want half a million in wages a month & someone who is eager to win things in the game not coming to the twighlight of their careers.
Who would have expected Brendan Rodgers to do well at Liverpool?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Midgeyboy View PostWhere`s this "Pullis is boring" come from?
Harry is about as boring as it gets.
Sure Pullis` teams may not be world beaters but how many "big" teams have they scalped over the years?
He`s a manager that sets his team out to be hard to beat and get in the oppo`s faces, That`s what were crying out for IMO.
There is 31 games left to get it right, Howe, Robinson etc.would have been better for us in the Championship but would be like a fish out of water now, with the state the club is/could be in.
No point looking for a manager for the next 3-4 years, we need one now. (well,we soon will I guess).
Just to actually give a team a competitive game would be a bonus at the moment and Pulis would definitely make us do that. Even if he is just here for a couple of years but keeps us up in that time then it has to be worth it.
Who cares about short term or not, once we have steadied the ship for a couple of seasons then we can start talking about up and coming modern exciting manaers. Too much of a risk at the moment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nick View PostDo not want Pulis here!!....
He's just a quick fix IMO. He'll keep us up, probably mid table next season then comes the long boring football and before long it'll be 'Pulis Out' we want more attractive football!.... IF Harry's going we need a new start with someone who's got a bit of freshness about them a bit like Ronald Koeman, Garry Monk even Nigel Person all bring a fresh approach to the game, seem to play without fear. Whether this is a good thing only time will tell. But 1 things for sure their a lot more exciting to watch than us and than Stoke ever were.
Im not sure who's really out their and available but IMO Pulis will be Harry Redknapp number 2 and we'll be in this exact position all over again in 2/3 seasons time looking for yet another manager.
2 seasons of Premiership football would help QPR to attract a new manager if QPR are not happy with Pulis' style.
Comment
-
Originally posted by THE CAT View PostBang on with this my learned friend.
Just to actually give a team a competitive game would be a bonus at the moment and Pulis would definitely make us do that. Even if he is just here for a couple of years but keeps us up in that time then it has to be worth it.
Who cares about short term or not, once we have steadied the ship for a couple of seasons then we can start talking about up and coming modern exciting manaers. Too much of a risk at the moment.
I#'d much rather watch that than Redknapp's teams passing the ball backward and sideways without making any progress and not getting many tackles in.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fordy View PostDon't see the obsession with Pulis. I for one would be against him as our next manager. He's just the trendy option at the moment because he done well at Palace. Stoke fans pushed him out of their club. I think our next appointment should be long term thinking someone like Howe, McClaren, Clement, Clarke or look abroad and find a pochetinno or koeman
Comment
-
Originally posted by stanistheman View Postkeeping QPR up this season and next would be well worth it. If QPR go down the likely threat is paying off a great big FL fine or playing 3rd 4th or Conference league football.
2 seasons of Premiership football would help QPR to attract a new manager if QPR are not happy with Pulis' style.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by winalotto View PostAll he has said is , he is not signing a contract until the end of the season , and if we are relegated he will walk , and all of a sudden rumours are he has walked away , minimum he has 6 games before anything happens imo
are gonna be livid. He ain't got a chance. There's an inevitability about all this.
I don't understand how professional athletes cannot be fit. Someone at the club needs to come out and tell us. They haven't all been injured
from the start, but we have been lacklustre and quite frankly dire apart from maybe 2 games?
Comment
Comment