A couple of weeks ago the word from the ITK crew was that we were bringing in a striker on loan, poss with a view to a permanent signing in Jan. So well and good. Now whenever this is brought up by various posters, the question is ignored with magisterial indifference. If this is simply because Pete and others don't know, then fair enough, Gianni can't be expected to be on the blower 24/7. Similarly, if the club is in such chaos behind the scenes with Flavio-gate that no such decisions can be made, I also wouldn't be that surprised. But if it is because after one win the feeling is we no longer need one then we should be told the thinking has changed.
So which is it plse? If you do answer this time, many thanks.
So which is it plse? If you do answer this time, many thanks.
Comment