In today's Metro poll: 77% say drop Ferdinand

[Hubble]

http://metro.co.uk/2014/09/29/harry-redknapp-must-drop-rio-ferdinand-if-qpr-are-to-have-a-chance-4885513/

Harry Redknapp must drop Rio Ferdinand if QPR are to have a chance
Monday 29 Sep 2014 9:34 am

QPR boss Harry Redknapp must drop Rio Ferdinand
Charlie Austin celebrates after scoring a wonder goal to level the scores against Southampton (Picture: Getty Images)
When Charlie Austin controlled the ball exquisitely with his right foot, turned and volleyed with his left in one fell swoop to level with a wonderful finish it looked like QPR’s fortunes were about to change.


Should Rio Ferdinand be dropped by QPR

YES - 77%
NO - 23%

[Harryboy]

You know it wont happen saggy chops loves him to much

[Hubble]

[12321]

Ok, so we drop Ferdinand and results don't change, what do we do then?

[Fordy]

Ok, so we drop Ferdinand and results don't change, what do we do then?

Then we admit we're just pony. Worth a try though.

[Hubble]

Who edited my original post with all the text from the article??

[West London is Rss]

Ok, so we drop Ferdinand and results don't change, what do we do then?

Get rid of Harry.

[Rangers77]

You know it wont happen saggy chops loves him to much

Should is different to will..... No one on here can surely want him to play.

[West London is Rss]

He was awful.. it was only when I got home and watched MOTD that I realised it was his #### poor chip, that gave the ball away for their goal!!

[Manx Hoop]

Ive never much rated him, get the ham shanker gone.

[Kirill]

Who edited my original post with all the text from the article??

One of the mods will sometimes do that, when an article is quoted MYU wants it linked properly, something about copyright adherence.

[hh9]

Ok, so we drop Ferdinand and results don't change, what do we do then?

Ok, so we drop Ferdinand and results change, what are we going to do with Antons brother.

[CroydonCaptainJack]

One of the mods will sometimes do that, when an article is quoted MYU wants it linked properly, something about copyright adherence.

If you provide the link, the site gets the hits. That seems to be the right thing to do.

[Hubble]

If you provide the link, the site gets the hits. That seems to be the right thing to do.

I did provide the link, as per, but I didn't realise you can't quote directly from an article. I've done that many times elsewhere, never been a problem, but fair enough, if that's this site's policy.

Anyway, to the issue in question, like so many things with being a Rangers fan over the years - how can it be so obvious to so many of us, yet not to old Hazza? Surely that can mean one of two things? A) Harry is a stubborn git, won't admit he made a mistake signing someone over the hill like Ferdinand, and now feels obliged to play him, or B) Harry knows better than the majority of QPR fans and expects Rio to come good, eventually, at some point in the season.

When Ferdinand's signing was first mooted, many people foresaw this issue arising, that we would be signing someone 'too big to drop'. This now seem to be the case. Harry needs to take some viagra and ####ing well sort it out, because we've got a blinding CB in Onuoha, getting splinters in his #### from sitting on the bench.

[maverick69]

I did provide the link, as per, but I didn't realise you can't quote directly from an article. I've done that many times elsewhere, never been a problem, but fair enough, if that's this site's policy.

Anyway, to the issue in question, like so many things with being a Rangers fan over the years - how can it be so obvious to so many of us, yet not to old Hazza? Surely that can mean one of two things? A) Harry is a stubborn git, won't admit he made a mistake signing someone over the hill like Ferdinand, and now feels obliged to play him, or B) Harry knows better than the majority of QPR fans and expects Rio to come good, eventually, at some point in the season.

When Ferdinand's signing was first mooted, many people foresaw this issue arising, that we would be signing someone 'too big to drop'. This now seem to be the case. Harry needs to take some viagra and ####ing well sort it out, because we've got a blinding CB in Onuoha, getting splinters in his #### from sitting on the bench.

You can't quote the whole article like you did as that's plagiarism - and an infringement of copyright law in many cases.

Quoting key parts of an article in "......." and providing the link (a citation) is generally accepted to be ok...... on the internet at least.