Are Ferdinand and Caulker undroppable?

[MattyRangers]

Tbh , reputations & CVs aside, from what I have seen this year, Ned is comfortably as good as either of them. Shame he isn't playing, I think he will be off come January if he still isn't getting a look in. Too good a player to sit on the bench every week.

[West London is Rss]

Nonsense. It's just posing a question and having a debate. If youre going to misinterpret it as stirring thats up to you and nothing anyone can do about that. However this thread was started to create fair debate and discussion and if youre now going to insist on derailing that then.....

Mate your suggestion rather than question is to put Dunne, Hill or Ned at Centre back instead of Caulker and Rio?.. I don't see how that can be a serious question therefore I put it down to stirring and more calling out players after a loss.

[Stanley]

Mate your suggestion rather than question is to put Dunne, Hill or Ned and Centre back instead of Caulker and Rio?.. I don't see how that can be a serious question therefore I put it down to stirring and more calling out players after a loss.

Mate, I'm not strongly advocating anything one way or the other. I'm merely posing a couple of questions because I think it warrants debate, as others appear to also.

I asked if Rio and Caulker are undroppable. You appear to think not. That's great. Others may think differently however, which is great too. Hence a discussion on it - it's very simple.

[West London is Rss]

Mate, I'm not strongly advocating anything one way or the other. I'm merely posing a couple of questions because I think it warrants debate, as others appear to also.

I asked if Rio and Caulker are undroppable. You appear to think not. That's great. Others may think differently however, which is great too. Hence a discussion on it - it's very simple.

Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.. especially from Admin.

[Stanley]

Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.. especially from Admin.

I'm not even being slightly sarcastic mate.

[Rangersw12]

Rio Ferdinand already proving his doubters correct

How many goals have been his fault this season already ?

[Nick]

Rio Ferdinand already proving his doubters correct

How many goals have been his fault this season already ?

3, Hull and 2 yesterday I think? Although tbf he had a blinder against Hull (apart from the goal of course)

[WeAreQPR12]

Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit.. especially from Admin.

You're showing a lack of class in your posts.
I am trying to catch up on things qpr, I don't want to read your little tantrums during my lunch break.

Stanley don't give the bloke the time of day that he is clearly craving for.

[WeAreQPR12]

Going back to topic, I think Ned should be starting as a centre half.

[West London is Rss]

3, Hull and 2 yesterday I think? Although tbf he had a blinder against Hull (apart from the goal of course)

And a good game against Sunderland.. Hull was his fault.

1st goal yesterday) Greens maybe but ball was just top notch quality wise.
2 goal) Niko.. Lost Herrera totally
3 goal) Possibly Caulker, not getting tight enough to Rooney
4 goal) No-ones.. Di-Maria shanked it.. The only way the ball was ever getting to matter was from a miss-hit shank

[West London is Rss]

You're showing a lack of class in your posts.
I am trying to catch up on things qpr, I don't want to read your little tantrums during my lunch break.

Stanley don't give the bloke the time of day that he is clearly craving for.

haha coming from you.. pipedown.

take your nose out of Stanley's a3sehole and get back to earing your sandwich

[Nick]

And a good game against Sunderland.. Hull was his fault.

1st goal yesterday) Greens maybe but ball was just top notch quality wise.
2 goal) Niko.. Lost Herrera totally
3 goal) Possibly Caulker, not getting tight enough to Rooney
4 goal) No-ones.. Di-Maria shanked it.. The only way the ball was ever getting to matter was from a miss-hit shank

3rd goal 100% Rios fault, looked slow and should have been a lot tighter to Rooney (think you're getting Caulker and Rio mixed up)

4th IMO Rio should have been marking Mata before the ball even got to him. It was a defensive situation and defenders need to be picking up their player.

[Lunar Jetman]

Going back to topic, I think Ned should be starting as a centre half.

Yes going back to the topic, I don't think that Ned will offer anything more than has been on show so far....

[bakes8]

3rd goal 100% Rios fault, looked slow and should have been a lot tighter to Rooney (think you're getting Caulker and Rio mixed up)

4th IMO Rio should have been marking Mata before the ball even got to him. It was a defensive situation and defenders need to be picking up their player.

3rd goal near post. Massive mistake by Green but Caulker shouldve been tighter on Rooney.

[WeAreQPR12]

Yes going back to the topic, I don't think that Ned will offer anything more than has been on show so far....

Pace and turning circle of a sports car?