Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

QPR struggling to offload Shaun Wright-Phillips

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I don't understand why he was named in the 25 when he was told he wouldn't be involved and clearly the club want him gone. The spot in the squad he was given could've been left free for any possible free agent. Just about sums his time with us .

    Comment


    • #17
      Loan him to this lot.....

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by MYU View Post
        You can't copy & paste content from other sites to your own due to copyright and you don't get paid to send people to other sites in this way. If that was the case everyone would be doing it, most websites would rather keep you on their site by copy & pasting so that they don't ever leave, it's the same as stealing.

        People write content for those sites, if we all started to copy & paste then those website wouldn't generate any hits, this would then mean they would stop writing content. We're doing the right thing by sending people who want to read it to the actual website that article is from.
        As long as you cross reference the original link, then that is legal? When you read some books or articles they have "references" to the original source/author.

        Comment


        • #19
          Wonder which parasite/freeloader has cost us more, SWP or Bosingwa?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Ed the Ball View Post
            As long as you cross reference the original link, then that is legal? When you read some books or articles they have "references" to the original source/author.
            Sorry for the change of subject, here is some text taken from 'http://venturevillage.eu'.

            Rest assured, it’s illegal to copy your contents

            In contrast to a site’s design, its contents – including texts, photos, graphics and data – quickly fall under copyright protection. A website’s terms and conditions can outline that it is protected as a platform for literary work, which means that, while from a legal perspective you’re allowed to be “inspired” by others’ design and layout, the same doesn’t apply to a site’s contents. If contents are copied without the owner’s consent, the copycat can face an injunction and will likely have to pay damages.
            It's not worth the risk and people who copy & paste here will not check the terms & conditions before doing so. It's far easier to copy & paste the first line followed by a link to the actual website, and it's safe.

            In regards to SWP, I hope the club have learned from this and other players. Contracts need to have a small print to protect the club.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Gerryhatrick View Post
              Wonder which parasite/freeloader has cost us more, SWP or Bosingwa?
              Probably be about the same.

              Saw it mentioned somewhere that SWP will have cost the club around £14m (wages,transfer fee etc) by the time he leaves. What an absolute waste of money for a club of our size.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by devonhoop View Post
                I don't understand why he was named in the 25 when he was told he wouldn't be involved and clearly the club want him gone. The spot in the squad he was given could've been left free for any possible free agent. Just about sums his time with us .
                The rules state if a player is eligible and there is space in the 25 they have to be named. Nothing the club could do about it.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Could it conceivably be in his Ts&Cs that while in contract he must remain in the first team squad?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Gerryhatrick View Post
                    Could it conceivably be in his Ts&Cs that while in contract he must remain in the first team squad?
                    No.

                    The rules state if a player is eligible and a space is free they have to be named.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Norths View Post
                      Probably be about the same.

                      Saw it mentioned somewhere that SWP will have cost the club around £14m (wages,transfer fee etc) by the time he leaves. What an absolute waste of money for a club of our size.
                      That goal alone was worth £14m of anybody's money!

                      Joking aside, he is really quite poo poo.
                      You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        SWP makes Rowan Vine look like a welfare case......

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Rich View Post
                          We should offer Norwich a swap deal with Redmond. We continue paying SWP wages for the season but we get a much better player. Then when the season is over SWP is a free man so at Champ level he might get himself a deal elsewhere next season....
                          Norwich would have to be mental to accept such a deal.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by devonhoop View Post
                            I don't understand why he was named in the 25 when he was told he wouldn't be involved and clearly the club want him gone. The spot in the squad he was given could've been left free for any possible free agent. Just about sums his time with us .
                            Exactly. It was a stupid and unnecessary thing to do and now QPR can't bring in anyone else until January.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by stanistheman View Post
                              Exactly. It was a stupid and unnecessary thing to do and now QPR can't bring in anyone else until January.
                              Originally posted by Norths View Post
                              The rules state if a player is eligible and there is space in the 25 they have to be named. Nothing the club could do about it.
                              ...

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                That's not fair, what if we wanted to loan the player out to a lower division club?

                                That would take away one of the slots?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X