Tweet
...at least a win would be guaranteed each week!
-
-
What a load of old bowlox hahahahaTop Scorers 2018/2019
Nakhi Wells - 8
Pawel Wszolek - 6
Luke Freeman - 6
Matt Smith - 6
Ebere Eze - 4
Joel Lynch - 3
Tomer Hemed - 3
Toni Leistner - 2
Massimo Luongo- 2
Angel Rangel - 2
Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
Geoff Cameron - 1
Aramide Oteh - 1
Jake Bidwell - 1
Jordan Cousins - 1
Summer Transfers 2019
IN
OUTComment
-
Bosh.... and that took 2 min: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/index_en.htm
More holes in FFP than Bristow's dartboard.........Comment
-
-
what about the 40 million over three years that premier league relegated teams get?
and when we won the play offs does that 110 million count as income for the year?Comment
-
the first (and only) part of £40m over 3 years (about £16m) hardly touched the sides... even after that amount is paid to us, the loss of £38m in tv revenue still meant that cutting running costs by £22m per year would leave us with the same loss as we got in the premiership.Originally posted by a fan of qpr View Post
no, the £110m is a mishmash of tv money for t least 1 season (about £64m) and a new lot of parachute payments (about £46m after inflation spread over 3 years) - it needs to be matched to the seasons.Comment
-
There is no way we would ever be booted out to the Conference. If push came to shove we'd either just pay the fine or challenge the whole ridiculous thing in court, in which case the first thing we would do would be to get an injunction preventing any sanctions until the court case had been resolved.'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.Comment
-
this dopey rule will never stick in a court of law. It is quite frankly bizarre.Comment
-
Imagine a 40k stadium in the conference Eh !"Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%?
For us that would mean around 29k."
QPR Richard 16-12-2013 10.08pmComment
-
imagine the advantage we'd get from the parachute payments! we would destroy everyone every game...Originally posted by NW_Hoopz View PostComment
-
-
No, that won't happen. Trust me, I know about law, and this just won't happen.Comment
-
I'm sure any good lawyer could prove a restraint of trade case. Why is it one club, Man Utd, can carry around £400m of debt but spend £150m on players, yet we are forbidden to carry a loss of £64m? If there's going to be a level playing field, wages and transfer fees have to be the same for every club in their respective divisions. That way, clubs can invest in their squads at the same level as everyone else.Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.Comment
-
Don´t think our accounts will be as bad as last time. Think accounts will show a loss of around £8m ;-) come December.Comment
-
From what ive just heard on Talksport , the problem lies in if we went down ,TF refuses to pay or decides to cut his losses and walks away......Lets just hope the faith that many of you have got in Fernandes is justified ,because we could be proper f ucked if its notRangers,Scooters ,Tunes and TrainersComment
Comment