Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SWP in squad. Harriman isn't.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    maybe he's saving him for chelsea away

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Rangers77 View Post
      I'm confused. Offy says

      Players born on or after January 1st 1993 are classed as under-21 players and are therefore eligible to feature throughout the season despite not being named in the official 25-man squad

      Harriman was born in October 1992. So he's not eligible? Anyone know? Ehmer is in the squad.
      full official list for every team is at http://www.premierleague.com/content...ember-2014.pdf (we're pages 31 (non-youth players) and 32 (youth players)) - harriman is not on either list, so not eligible until january.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by klonk View Post
        full official list for every team is at http://www.premierleague.com/content...ember-2014.pdf (we're pages 31 (non-youth players) and 32 (youth players)) - harriman is not on either list, so not eligible until january.
        Just an observation on our new squad composition: We have only six that are not "homegrown". That is second only to Burnley that have only five non-HG. BTW one of our non-HG is Charlie. Worst in this regard(and many others) with only three HG players is...take a guess...
        https://twitter.com/1qprdk

        Comment


        • #64
          I'm not going to guess, but the rules say that you must have at least 8 HG players in the 25, iirc.

          Edit; only if you submit a full 25-man squad. I guess a better way to look at it is no more than 17 non home-grown players in the squad.

          Oh, and it's Chelsea.
          Last edited by Buffalo; 04-09-2014, 01:34 PM.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by klonk View Post
            full official list for every team is at http://www.premierleague.com/content...ember-2014.pdf (we're pages 31 (non-youth players) and 32 (youth players)) - harriman is not on either list, so not eligible until january.
            Well that's that. Thanks.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Buffalo View Post
              "Contribution" aside, I was referring to several episodes with Adel like refusing to train, turning up unfit, storming off in a sulk etc. which would likely have resulted in a written warning to any "ordinary" person in an ordinary workplace. I have seen no evidence of such things from SWP.
              When Adel refused to train, he was penalised. Remember Harry's saying that every time he turns up late he was deducted money from his was wages! Just like a working place! As for SWP.....agree re-training and making himself available, however, when giving the chance to play, although very rare....he blew it. Case in point...Burton.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Pie & mash View Post
                Are SWP & Jenas the last 2 of the failed mercenary generation?
                To be fair, Jenas looked fairly handy when he was fit.

                SWP is, well, total shyte.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Martinmalta View Post
                  When Adel refused to train, he was penalised. Remember Harry's saying that every time he turns up late he was deducted money from his was wages! Just like a working place! As for SWP.....agree re-training and making himself available, however, when giving the chance to play, although very rare....he blew it. Case in point...Burton.
                  Yes, I didn't say he wasn't penalised. But if you or I repeatedly mess up we would receive a number of warnings and either learn or be fired. I am saying that if that logic was applied to footballers, it is likely that Adel would have been fired some time ago, whereas SWP would not.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Pie & mash View Post
                    Never liked SWP, coining it in with no regard for anyone else.

                    That's champagne socialists for you though I suppose
                    You clearly know more about his politics than the rest of us!

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Rangers77 View Post
                      Well that's that. Thanks.
                      Assume the club want to loan him out to get game time. Not necessarily a bad thing.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Suppose so. But I'm glad we didn't do that with the likes of Clive Allen. Paul Goddard or Gary Waddock. He really should be in our squad given we have only one RB. And a RWB at that.... Ned at RB if Isla is injured will be ugly.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X