Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fabio Borini

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Hoop-du-Jour View Post
    James Olley ‏@JamesOlley 14m

    Borini's deal to #QPR: Fee agreed with #lfc - £10m rising to £13m - but wages the issue. Player wants £90k-a-wk. Club offered £58k so far.

    Not gonna happen methinks
    Is this bloke reliable? I can't imagine for a minute that he is really demanding 90k a week.....he's probably on just over half that at Liverpool.

    Comment


    • #77
      Harry just been on SSN, said maybe and that TF was talking to his agent
      I should probably write something insightful here

      Comment


      • #78
        Harry also said Diarra still in talks

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Hoop-du-Jour View Post
          James Olley ‏@JamesOlley 14m

          Borini's deal to #QPR: Fee agreed with #lfc - £10m rising to £13m - but wages the issue. Player wants £90k-a-wk. Club offered £58k so far.

          Not gonna happen methinks
          standard claims he is on 58k at liverpool but we are offering 80k. find it v hard to believe.

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by stainrodisalegend View Post
            standard claims he is on 58k at liverpool but we are offering 80k. find it v hard to believe.
            40k a week or do one. And take SWP with you, PLEEEEEEEASE!

            Comment


            • #81
              This is clearly ******** - the bloke who tweeted this is the Chief Football Correspondent for the Evening Standard....who ran a story about 10 minutes ago that we are going to offer him 80k a week. This James Olley geezer is just looking for attention.

              Comment


              • #82
                It's the Standard for fuc*s sake, it's cheaper than the Daily Star
                I should probably write something insightful here

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Pie & mash View Post
                  It's the Standard for fuc*s sake, it's cheaper than the Daily Star
                  Right, but the bloke who tweeted that wages were an issue is the Chief Football Correspondent at the Standard....so either his rag is talking shite, or he is.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Pie & mash View Post
                    It's the Standard for fuc*s sake, it's cheaper than the Daily Star
                    James Olley ✔ @JamesOlley

                    Borini's deal to #QPR: Fee agreed with #lfc - £10m rising to £13m - but wages the issue. Player wants £90k-a-wk. Club offered £58k so far.
                    Retweeted by hassan

                    if he wants 90k fark him off. we are talking to ayew as well.
                    nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by surrey_hoop View Post
                      Right, but the bloke who tweeted that wages were an issue is the Chief Football Correspondent at the Standard....so either his rag is talking shite, or he is.
                      I'm suggesting both are
                      I should probably write something insightful here

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Pie & mash View Post
                        I'm suggesting both are
                        And I'm suggesting that one of them must be wrong.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Both probably
                          I should probably write something insightful here

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by surrey_hoop View Post
                            And I'm suggesting that one of them must be wrong.
                            Why can't they both be?

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Originally posted by Pie & mash View Post
                              Both probably
                              Clearly one of them is wrong.....

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by Lunar Jetman View Post
                                Why can't they both be?
                                Because you can't simultaneously offer one person two different salaries.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X