Long way to go yet and we have new players and systems to bed in. How many times does a minnow or newly promoted team start promisingly and then dramatically, and often catastrophically, fall away? On the other hand, how often does a team marooned/doomed at foot of table and seemingly a goner perk up and scramble up the table? I can see us falling between these two stools.... the points WILL come; lets see where we are after 9/10 games.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
There is no miracle cure...
Collapse
X
-
We should probably take it easy BUT why is it always QPR that needs to be bettered - Leicester did well against Chelsea and Burnley did reasonable at Swansea yesterday. Would be nice if we in these kind of matches could at least do a decent job at parking the bus to prevent these 4-0 5-0 defeats.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kirill View PostGet your facts straight, I wanted Harry out in the spring already (just like I did Hughes after we were saved from relegation by Stoke on the last day at Man City). Best thing Harry could have done after getting us relegated and then promoted in a most circumvent way was to retire from QPR, finish his input on a high note. But managers never do. Now we have Hughes Mark II (no pun intended) situation. I saw it earlier than others so I got abuse already in the spring, well boo hoo, I'll live.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostIt's far too early to think about changing the manager, we're only two games in!
Always knee jerk reactions after a loss...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nick View PostHow did we play against Hull? I've forgotten, I take it we played like today?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kirill View PostGet your facts straight, I wanted Harry out in the spring already (just like I did Hughes after we were saved from relegation by Stoke on the last day at Man City). Best thing Harry could have done after getting us relegated and then promoted in a most circumvent way was to retire from QPR, finish his input on a high note. But managers never do. Now we have Hughes Mark II (no pun intended) situation. I saw it earlier than others so I got abuse already in the spring, well boo hoo, I'll live.
The problem is any coherent team was missing under his tenure, all the players that have come in this summer plus Austin can't be faulted. Not one buy was wrong, the team needs to be created but I think for once we have the players, something I never thought we had under MH. Not the time to panic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by zuluop View PostWe should probably take it easy BUT why is it always QPR that needs to be bettered - Leicester did well against Chelsea and Burnley did reasonable at Swansea yesterday. Would be nice if we in these kind of matches could at least do a decent job at parking the bus to prevent these 4-0 5-0 defeats.
Comment
-
The honest answer is no, TF will not wait as long as he did with Hughes if things don't improve rapidly.
No one can seriously be suggesting a back 3 which has Rio plus either Clint or RD - unless forced to by circs. We'd end up too deep.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Kirill;1312639]Get your facts straight, I wanted Harry out in the spring already (just like I did Hughes after we were saved from relegation by Stoke on the last day at Man City). Best thing Harry could have done after getting us relegated and then promoted in a most circumvent way was to retire from QPR, finish his input on a high note. But managers never do. Now we have Hughes Mark II (no pun intended) situation. I saw it earlier than others so I got abuse already in the spring, well boo hoo, I'll live.[/
cant not believe im siding with krills again........twice no...................but he has valid points!
QUOTE]you know nothing john snow!!!!
Comment
Comment