What I'm saying is if he created 6 on the first day, what will he/they be like once they get to know each other on the pitch, will only get better.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Harry looking for 3 more.
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostDe Guzman hasn't gone anywhere yet, and the Fer deal might be happening today. Perhaps those two plus this lad from France or Siggy might be the three?
If so, we should have a reasonable squad.
Looks like we are getting Fer.
I don't think we will get sig, I reckon we will get Vargas.
(judging from the news i've read)
Comment
-
Originally posted by MYU View PostCan we not loan out one of Hill or Dunne, and bring in a defender on loan?
They should not be starting.
Comment
-
Would love to know what the transfer budget is. I think we've spent around £14m so far. De Guzman and Fer would cost probably the same again, and a striker another £7m. That means around £35m.
We need players, and hopefully we've got the money for these guys.Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostWould love to know what the transfer budget is. I think we've spent around £14m so far. De Guzman and Fer would cost probably the same again, and a striker another £7m. That means around £35m.
We need players, and hopefully we've got the money for these guys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostWould love to know what the transfer budget is. I think we've spent around £14m so far. De Guzman and Fer would cost probably the same again, and a striker another £7m. That means around £35m.
We need players, and hopefully we've got the money for these guys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stainrodisalegend View PostDont think we will spend nearly that much. Fer 7/8m, prob the ex wba guy for v little or holtby on loan with a view to buy or (worse case scenario) niko on loan. Be amazed if we got de gurzman. Harry also said the 4th striker is "cover" so really cant see us spending big - maybe a young loan. Think the board more or less thought their business was done and harry has squeezed some extra out of them but not going to be another 20m imo.Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostThen again, it could be worth the gamble because the likes of Mutch and Caulker have a resale value, as would De Guzman and Fer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stainrodisalegend View PostTrue but its all money that has tb paid out now. Think tony is said tb worth 200m - a fortune to all of us (bar perhaps tw rangers) but doesnt go far if you are talking 35m a window, even if shared with the mittels. These are big sums and so far i dont think after 50/60 odd signings this board has turned a profit on a single deal. Will be wary imo for the same reason the palace chairman has said he would rather go down than go crazy.
As a financial project this is very front loaded as ultimately they will be hoping the new ground and associated ventures will be a success. Doesn't always work though. Word on the street is Brighton thought they would be making money by now and have near capacity every game but are still losing. Hence over last couple of seasons their main players have been sold and have been replaced with largely rubbish. That said our owners are considerably richer than theirs and being based in London arguably more potential!
Comment
Comment