Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jim Magilton lost this match

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jim Magilton lost this match

    We can be really proud of this team and it should end up in top 6. While opponents got stronger in the second half we got weaker and weaker mostly because of subtitutions. This is how I saw this.
    Goalkeeping: Heaton was excellent and quickly looking to get the ball in play.
    Defence: Both fullbacks played well. Stewart had a good game but Gorrks not as good expecially his passing.
    Midfield: Played very well for 60 minutes. Faurlin was the best player in the match in the first half but faded. Rowlands also had a good match. Same can be said of Buzsaky and Routledge.
    Attack: Simpson and Vine are very good but need to play more matches together to get that understanding working. Simpson needed more service and the trouble with Vine last night was his final passing which was very bad.
    Manager: All his subtitutions made the team worse Taarabt for Vine made it weaker because Taarabt is so selfish. Ephraim for Rowlands made it also worse because without Rowlands we lost som bide in the middle. Finally Pellicori for Simpson was the worst of all. Touched the ball 2 times in 20 minutes and did not bother to run. Helguson would have been a good sub there (why HH is on loan and Pellicori is not is plainly wrong). I believe we should have got into extra time if the subtitution were not made.
    Then look at the other teams subs Lampard, Cole and Terry - all current England internationals.

  • #2
    Think you are being harsh. The players he took off were run into the ground, two of whom are coming back from career threatening injuries. The problem was there wasn't much quality - Tarabt aside - on the bench. We aren't Chelsea, we are a mid-table championship side, we don't have 11 international stars in the wings waiting to come on. If he had Fat Frank on the bench I'm sure Jim would have brought him on...

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by stainrodisalegend View Post
      Think you are being harsh. The players he took off were run into the ground, two of whom are coming back from career threatening injuries. The problem was there wasn't much quality - Tarabt aside - on the bench. We aren't Chelsea, we are a mid-table championship side, we don't have 11 international stars in the wings waiting to come on. If he had Fat Frank on the bench I'm sure Jim would have brought him on...
      Agree.
      Rowlands was tiring badly... totally understandable for obvious reasons.

      Simpson was hobbling, and ran himself stupid- again.
      We have a league game in 2 days time.

      Vine - same as Rowlands. Yes, Taraabt is a greedy sod, but can make things happen. I wouldn't have brought anyone else on for Vine.

      Agree about Pellicori, he's not looking good at all. But it was either him or Agyemang.
      I'd have probably brought on Pat, but he's not exactly Jermaine Defoe either.

      Really harsh on JM, we played with pride, shape and took Chelsea all the way.
      You can't realistically ask any more of him, given the players we have available to us.


      Comment

      Working...
      X