Tweet
As I posted the other day, this cd be the one factor that might just keep him with us. Buy out clause or not, there is nothing stopping TF offering Remy an improved contract and putting off other clubs. If we really are mad enough to pay Ferdinand £80,000 a week, I wd prefer to spend that money to keep Remy.
-
-
spot on stains.
i also think its criminal to pay ferdinand that sort of wage while only offering caulker less than half that.
just hope remy does'nt do a cisse on us next season.nsa/cia spy on this..............┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐ -
If thats true then arsenal are mad. Hes a goalscorer, french international and scored goals in a rubbish qpr team and a average newcastle team. Put him in a top four team and he'll bang them in. 80k for a striker of his calibre in this day of age is a snip and when you see they are paying more than double to other stars you can understand why remy is putting his foot down.
Even selling him for 10 mill is a bloody bargain. I mean if we are suppose to believe mcormack went for 11 mill then something is seriously wrong. He's the 1 player atm Id love tf to sit down and go look son give sign a 3 year deal, we'll give a 25 k a week pay wise bit we will put in another release clause 15 mill and you can go next summer. Gives us the year we all wanted from him, gives us a hell of a chance to stay up and remy can go next year why we scout for a new signing.Comment
-
Arsenal already have about six striker tho so would prob just be a reserve. Newcastle now reportedly looking elsewhere. For once our high wages might be working to our advantage.Comment
-
Where would you playe Remy? HR favours 4231 so would you pick him ahead of Austin, play him wide or go 442? We had mixed success with 442 last season.Comment
-
Got to have both Austin and Remy in there natural positions, 2 up front. Would be mad not to IMOOriginally posted by Burnside View Post
SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!Comment
-
Remy wants to play CL football and want massive wages, you'd think he would take a pay cut to play CL.
There's more to it which we don't know about maybe?Comment
-
Behind Austin as 1 of the 3 in a 4-2-3-1.Originally posted by Burnside View Post
Would love to see us keep him.Comment
-
two up front would leave us way too open, especially as our centre-mid will be pretty terrible in the PL
In the unlikely but wonderful scenario that Remy stays with us next season I'd either play him cutting in from the wing in a 433ish formation, or drop Austin and play Remy with (again, unlikely) Adel behind him and two direct wingers also making runs. Phillips + AN Other. The Remy/Adel combo looked great towards the end of 12/13Comment
-
remy isn't great at buildup play or creating chances but is superb on the shoulder of the last man. no point playing him behind a striker. if you mean out wide then yeah there is an argument for that, but it'd have to be very high up the pitch to get the best out of him, some way ahead of whoever plays the no10 position (a similar role to the one Mackie played in 2010/11)Originally posted by bakes8 View PostComment
-
Come the Hull game if Remy is still here then he needs to start, regardless of whether he wants to move or not. Get him on the pitch and get some wins.Comment
-
-
3-5-2 both of them playing. 2 very fit and mostly defensive wing backs!Comment
-
Id play him wide right or wide left in a 4-2-3-1 like he does for France, but I disagree, I can see him playing in a free role behind Chas.Originally posted by Geng View PostComment
-
Good shout. Next problem is what about if Taarabts still here and has got his head on?Originally posted by Rich View PostComment
Comment