If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Get rid he has been terrible for 90% of the time and on 50K + a week
He has been injured until March 2014. One year contract with the terms mentioned by Rangersw12 doesn't seem bad. After all that time, at least Bobby has earned us more than what we have paid for him.
Some fans are very generous with other peoples money. Let the club decide if he will be a useful asset next season or whether there is better available for less. These decisions shouldn't be made out of sentiment.
He has been injured until March 2014. One year contract with the terms mentioned by Rangersw12 doesn't seem bad. After all that time, at least Bobby has earned us more than what we have paid for him.
The fact he is injury prone and cant last 90 mins is another reason to get rid
Some fans are very generous with other peoples money. Let the club decide if he will be a useful asset next season or whether there is better available for less. These decisions shouldn't be made out of sentiment.
This.
Personally, nothings changed for me. He's still the same Bobby Zamora thats been driving me mad for the last couple of years.
Let him find another club and best of luck to him.
during his career, he's averaged 1 goal every 3 games, when fit. He proved at the end of the season, he can still be useful, however his fitness is a major problem and if we're naming a squad, do we really want one of our strikers being incapable of playing 90 minutes?
In 20-30 minutes, he's useful but you can't keep him on that basis. It doesn't make sense. Sorry Bobby!
Personally, scoring that goal alone makes him a Rangers legend but we're now in the PL and I don't think there's a place for him based on my above comments, re fitness.
Some fans are very generous with other peoples money. Let the club decide if he will be a useful asset next season or whether there is better available for less. These decisions shouldn't be made out of sentiment.
Totally agree if anyone else had scored the winner then we wouldn't even be having this conversation
I think his biggest asset now is his ability to hold the ball up and/or act as an outlet. It is feasible that in the last 20 mins or so of games next season we will be looking to hold out for a win or a point and then, he could be useful. I don't seeing him being picked as the 90 minute lone man up front, away at City or United and he can't do that now anyway but, on a reduced wage and as a last 20 to hold it up and bully the opposition (just like he did when he came on against Wigan in the S/F) there are few better options IMO.
from how many games? I say yes, a one year contract, him coming on with 20 mins/30 mins to go works for me, if we are chasing, he give us the option of knocking it long or holding it up if we need to keep hold of it.
Comment