PS v LDC

[Nodge70]

no comment.

I would say its unfair to compare first 10 of those games we had

Rehman, Barker, Bolder, Nardeillo, Sahar, Sinclair, Camp, Malcolm.

but aye, you fire away.

But they probably played, what, 5 games between them? (aside Camp, who, remember was still wunderkid until 5 games in this season)

[sirpiechucker]

Nice stats.

Do you want to run the same report only looking at goals conceded?

LDC - 45 goals conceded in 34 matches or 1.32 goals conceded per game
PS - 19 goals conceded in 23 matches or 0.82 goals conceded per game

[qblockpete]

Malcolm played 7 times

Rehman played more

Barker was played left back until January.

Sahar was a waste of space brought in by John Gregory.

Sinclair unfulfilled his potential, thinking too much about Chelsea.

Bolder was our regular centre midfielder up until Janauary.

Admittedly he had Mancienne, Vine and Cranie on loan (last two for 1 month), but still

[Youvebeenrangered]

YOU CANT COMPARE THEM! 2 totally different situations. LDC avoid Relegation. PS Promotion. 2 totally different sets of players!

[sirpiechucker]

no comment.

I would say its unfair to compare first 10 of those games we had

Rehman, Barker, Bolder, Nardeillo, Sahar, Sinclair, Camp, Malcolm.

but aye, you fire away.

LDC's first 5 team selections note how many times Sahar and Nardiello play:

QPR: Camp ,Mancienne ,Cranie ,Stewart ,Barker ,Rowlands ,Ephraim ,Leigertwood ,Buzsaky (Ainsworth ,86 ) ,Vine (Nardiello ,89 ) ,Nygaard (Bolder ,81)
Subs not used: Cole,Timoska,

QPR: Camp ,Mancienne ,Stewart ,Cranie (Timoska ,20 ) ,Barker ,Rowlands ,Leigertwood (Bolder ,39 ) ,Buzsaky ,Sinclair ,Vine ,Nygaard (Nardiello ,44)
Subs not used: Cole,Ainsworth,

QPR: Camp ,Timoska ,Stewart ,Mancienne ,Barker ,Rowlands (Ainsworth ,86 ) ,Bolder (Rehman ,89 ) ,Buzsaky ,Leigertwood ,Sinclair ,Vine (Sahar ,89)
Subs not used Cole,Nardiello,

QPR: Camp ,Malcolm (Timoska ,65 ) ,Mancienne ,Stewart ,Barker ,Rowlands ,Leigertwood ,Buzsaky ,Vine ,Blackstock (Nygaard ,82 ) ,Sinclair
Subs not used: Cole,Bolder,Ainsworth,

QPR: Camp ,Mancienne (Malcolm ,20 ) ,Stewart ,Timoska ,Barker ,Rowlands (Bolder ,81 ) ,Leigertwood ,Buzsaky ,Sinclair ,Vine (Nygaard ,79 ) ,Blackstock (sent off 47)
Subs not used Cole,Ainsworth,

[qprjames]

With the players LDC did better and some of the football we were playing was just amazing.

[qprjames]

LDC's first 5 team selections note how many times Sahar and Nardiello play:

QPR: Camp ,Mancienne ,Cranie ,Stewart ,Barker ,Rowlands ,Ephraim ,Leigertwood ,Buzsaky (Ainsworth ,86 ) ,Vine (Nardiello ,89 ) ,Nygaard (Bolder ,81)
Subs not used: Cole,Timoska,

QPR: Camp ,Mancienne ,Stewart ,Cranie (Timoska ,20 ) ,Barker ,[COLOR="red"]Rowlands[/COLOR] ,Leigertwood (Bolder ,39 ) ,Buzsaky ,Sinclair ,Vine ,Nygaard (Nardiello ,44)
Subs not used: Cole,Ainsworth,

QPR: Camp ,Timoska ,Stewart ,Mancienne ,Barker ,Rowlands (Ainsworth ,86 ) ,Bolder (Rehman ,89 ) ,Buzsaky ,Leigertwood ,Sinclair ,[COLOR="red"]Vine[/COLOR] (Sahar ,89)
Subs not used Cole,Nardiello,

QPR: Camp ,Malcolm (Timoska ,65 ) ,Mancienne ,Stewart ,Barker ,Rowlands ,Leigertwood ,Buzsaky ,Vine ,Blackstock (Nygaard ,82 ) ,Sinclair
Subs not used: Cole,Bolder,Ainsworth,

QPR: Camp ,Mancienne (Malcolm ,20 ) ,Stewart ,Timoska ,Barker ,[COLOR="red"]Rowlands [/COLOR](Bolder ,81 ) ,Leigertwood ,Buzsaky ,Sinclair ,Vine (Nygaard ,79 ) ,Blackstock (sent off 47)
Subs not used Cole,Ainsworth,

+camp in goal

The side was definatley worse then

[sirpiechucker]

How much better or worse is Camp compared to Cerny - not a lot?
How much better or worse is Manciennce compared to Ramage - not a lot?
How much better or worse is Barker compared to Delaney - not a lot?
How much better or worse is Nygaard compared to SDC - not a lot?

Stewart, Leigertwood and Ephraim are still regulars the difference really is whether you think Rowlands, Vine and Buzsaky are better than Routledge, Miller and Taraabt.

[writtler]

no comment.

I would say its unfair to compare first 10 of those games we had

Rehman, Barker, Bolder, Nardeillo, Sahar, Sinclair, Camp, Malcolm.

but aye, you fire away.

I'm not they are LDC's LAST 23 games...

[qprjames]

How much better or worse is Camp compared to Cerny - not a lot?
How much better or worse is Manciennce compared to Ramage - not a lot?
How much better or worse is Barker compared to Delaney - not a lot?
How much better or worse is Nygaard compared to SDC - not a lot?

Stewart, Leigertwood and Ephraim are still regulars the difference really is whether you think Rowlands, Vine and Buzsaky are better than Routledge, Miller and Taraabt.

Don't rate Camp at all.
Barker he was shoking
Nygard-no no no Would rather SDC any day

Ainsworth??


Answer this... In LDC's side do you think the following would get into it?

Gorkks
Connally
Delaney
Tarrabt
Cook
Routledge
Cerny

Think you will find the answer is yes to all

[Nodge70]

Don't rate Camp at all.
Barker he was shoking
Nygard-no no no Would rather SDC any day

Ainsworth??


Answer this... In LDC's side do you think the following would get into it?

Gorkks
Connally
Delaney
Tarrabt
Cook
Routledge
Cerny

Think you will find the answer is yes to all

Really???? :amazing:

For all his faults, Nygaard tried, showed a bit of bottle, had cojones and scored a few. None of those attributes can be given to SDC

[Nodge70]

LDC's first 5 team selections note how many times Sahar and Nardiello play:

QPR: Camp ,Mancienne ,Cranie ,Stewart ,Barker ,Rowlands ,Ephraim ,Leigertwood ,Buzsaky (Ainsworth ,86 ) ,Vine (Nardiello ,89 ) ,Nygaard (Bolder ,81)
Subs not used: Cole,Timoska,

QPR: Camp ,Mancienne ,Stewart ,Cranie (Timoska ,20 ) ,Barker ,Rowlands ,Leigertwood (Bolder ,39 ) ,Buzsaky ,Sinclair ,Vine ,Nygaard (Nardiello ,44)
Subs not used: Cole,Ainsworth,

QPR: Camp ,Timoska ,Stewart ,Mancienne ,Barker ,Rowlands (Ainsworth ,86 ) ,Bolder (Rehman ,89 ) ,Buzsaky ,Leigertwood ,Sinclair ,Vine (Sahar ,89)
Subs not used Cole,Nardiello,

QPR: Camp ,Malcolm (Timoska ,65 ) ,Mancienne ,Stewart ,Barker ,Rowlands ,Leigertwood ,Buzsaky ,Vine ,Blackstock (Nygaard ,82 ) ,Sinclair
Subs not used: Cole,Bolder,Ainsworth,

QPR: Camp ,Mancienne (Malcolm ,20 ) ,Stewart ,Timoska ,Barker ,Rowlands (Bolder ,81 ) ,Leigertwood ,Buzsaky ,Sinclair ,Vine (Nygaard ,79 ) ,Blackstock (sent off 47)
Subs not used Cole,Ainsworth,

Thanks - I knew someone would pull it our. QED!

[qblockpete]

Who got absolutely mocked/ridiculed for bringing in Nygarrd?

Anyway carry on.

Agree Nygarrd in this team would have scored a few more than SDC/.

[qprjames]

Really???? :amazing:

For all his faults, Nygaard tried, showed a bit of bottle, had cojones and scored a few. None of those attributes can be given to SDC

Yep-people dont give SDC credit for what he does do. His movement is actually quite good. Nygard was just a donkey

Anyway Paulo also has the options of other strikers but he has ignored them

[qblockpete]

Please don't tell me the teams above are better than

what we've had in Feb and March