Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Not a huge fan of Monsieur Barton but...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by West London is Rss View Post
    Your right in thinking that and im very proud of you for thinking that.. well done.. pat on the back!

    However its all well and good saying all that from reading this forum and comments from the people that have been to the away games.
    So can you please back up why you think his tactics are **** from what you have seen? Why the style of play has been **** and why his subs have been ****?
    You are having a laugh right?? You really dont think people who cant go to games can have an opinion???

    im not going to analyse every single game for you. But things like refusing to play yun after a MOTM performance. Personally id drop BAE simply for his attitude and lack of drive...how on earth can you keep playing Maiga and Keane. Tactic wise id like to experiment more to the lead up to the playoffs. Id like to see us attack more instead of holding back. Every time we get the ball we seem to go nowhere. Even shooting is an issue, something that we seem to be scared of, how can we score if we refuse to shoot..

    Listen we're all frustrated by our performances but even the one's who can't go can still see perfectly well how poor we've been playing.
    SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Nick View Post
      You are having a laugh right?? You really dont think people who cant go to games can have an opinion???

      im not going to analyse every single game for you. But things like refusing to play yun after a MOTM performance. Personally id drop BAE simply for his attitude and lack of drive...how on earth can you keep playing Maiga and Keane. Tactic wise id like to experiment more to the lead up to the playoffs. Id like to see us attack more instead of holding back. Every time we get the ball we seem to go nowhere. Even shooting is an issue, something that we seem to be scared of, how can we score if we refuse to shoot..

      Listen we're all frustrated by our performances but even the one's who can't go can still see perfectly well how poor we've been playing.
      your missing my opinion.. im not saying categorically THEY CANT HAVE AN OPINION.. cos that's ridiculous
      I am saying they wont have as well known opinion as someone who goes to every game and watches 0-93 mins every week.

      Of course there is more to the problem than that one paragraph you have said but I don't expect you to write all the issues cos we would be here all day.
      I agree with your summary of our play, style and subs though. It is glaringly obvious.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by West London is Rss View Post
        I agree with your summary of our play, style and subs though. It is glaringly obvious.
        Which basically proves his point, and the point i was making beforehand.....

        As for matchgoers having a better insight, it was only recently Kevin Mcleod, who's comment raised this mini debate, said thay a chance wasnt a chance if the player misses...... even if an open goal from a yard out.

        Comment


        • #64
          It doesnt get registered and documented in any statistics if its not on target is what i said, so doesnt ever go down in history books as a 'chance' (shot off targets arent considered chances, cos they could be from the halfway line and hit the corner flag). And im correct in saying that.

          Comment


          • #65
            IMO you don't get the same angle on the game sitting in your armchair then you would live at the game.

            I think most people who go to every match would agree with this and I think most people who don't go to games of course, wouldn't agree with it.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View Post
              It doesnt get registered and documented in any statistics if its not on target is what i said, so doesnt ever go down in history books as a 'chance' (shot off targets arent considered chances, cos they could be from the halfway line and hit the corner flag). And im correct in saying that.
              At the time you were stating if a player missed a chance it's not a chance. It was not said in the context of history books and statistics.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Del View Post
                At the time you were stating if a player missed a chance it's not a chance. It was not said in the context of history books and statistics.
                "If a player missed a chance it's not a chance"

                Dellboy my little fruit bat what are you going on about????
                SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by West London is Rss View Post
                  IMO you don't get the same angle on the game sitting in your armchair then you would live at the game.

                  I think most people who go to every match would agree with this and I think most people who don't go to games of course, wouldn't agree with it.
                  With regards to seeing the actual game then of course nobody would dispute that you get a better vantage being at the game as can take in everything off camera too.

                  However, not being at the game doesnt prevent you seeing if we pass around at the back or in midfield for the sake of it, have no cutting edge, create no chances, have no ideas, are weak in certain areas, Harry is tactically inept, have loan players who offfer nothing, Harry repeatedly plays players who are useless, some players have been shut out for no apparent reason etc etc ect.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Nick View Post
                    "If a player missed a chance it's not a chance"

                    Dellboy my little fruit bat what are you going on about????
                    It wasn't me who was saying it... read my posts.

                    To re-phrase, he was suggesting it isnt a chance if a player missed the goal, even if a sitter..

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Del View Post
                      It wasn't me who was saying it... read my posts.

                      To re-phrase, he was suggesting it isnt a chance if a player missed the goal, even if a sitter..
                      I know matey, I was only winding you up. It just made me laugh when I read it, thats all.
                      SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Del View Post
                        At the time you were stating if a player missed a chance it's not a chance. It was not said in the context of history books and statistics.
                        Oh really, im actually that thick that when a commentator screams 'chance for hoillett' i scream back 'no it isnt a chance as the strike was fluffed as per usual'.
                        Some proper funny people on this forum, proper funny. Not in the humour sense either.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View Post
                          Oh really, im actually that thick that when a commentator screams 'chance for hoillett' i scream back 'no it isnt a chance as the strike was fluffed as per usual'.
                          Some proper funny people on this forum, proper funny. Not in the humour sense either.
                          That's exactly how it came across at the time, hence people's reaction to it. Don't get precious about it, I'm glad that isn't the case.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X