Tweet
Originally posted by brightonr
View Post
-
Only guessing here, but i would imagine that it was just a verbal loan, and no money or contract involved, so no rules apply. -
God we do love a taarabt and remy thread on here lolComment
-
Wouldn't have been any need had we kept hold of them.Originally posted by West London is Rss View Post
Comment
-
haha god knows what will happen when we have a team of players, of that quality in about 20 years when were in the champions league ;)
If we let any of them go, it'd go into meltdown on here!Comment
-
we'd turn into Arsenal fans and berate any player that leaves!!Originally posted by West London is Rss View PostTop Scorers 2018/2019
Nakhi Wells - 8
Pawel Wszolek - 6
Luke Freeman - 6
Matt Smith - 6
Ebere Eze - 4
Joel Lynch - 3
Tomer Hemed - 3
Toni Leistner - 2
Massimo Luongo- 2
Angel Rangel - 2
Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
Geoff Cameron - 1
Aramide Oteh - 1
Jake Bidwell - 1
Jordan Cousins - 1
Summer Transfers 2019
IN
OUTComment
-
Yes that's correct but there was a clause in the loan deal that allowed it to be terminated if both us and Fulham agreed. We both did so it was....Originally posted by brightonr View Post
Comment
-
Nothing to do with money mate. Taylor quite clearly said it was because the loan ended at start of June but so did Adels. So if there was an opportunity to have Adel back from a season long loan why would the same not apply to have Remy back early obviously dependent upon Newcastle agreeing to this.Originally posted by Ginger Ninja View Post
If he had big row with Pardew today and Newcastle said do one and sent him back does this mean we would still be unable to use him (same principle as Adel)Comment
-
Adel... No club in the UK want him.Originally posted by West Acton View Post
Remy... WANTED.
Can't see Newcastle sending him back.Comment
-
I guess it would depend on whether we had a recall clause in the contract. They could send him back but they'd still have him named in their squad for the Premiership and he'd still be officially signed on loan to Newcastle as far as the FA and Football League are concerned.Originally posted by West Acton View PostComment
-
TBF, just because those fans didn't know it, doesn't mean it wasn't certain!Originally posted by knocker View Post
53.2.3 A Player whose Standard Loan expires (or terminates) on completion of his Loaning Club's League Matches will not be eligible to play for his Parent Club (where it is a Member Club) in any remaining League Matches in that Season notwithstanding the fact that such expiry or termination occurs during a Transfer Window.
'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.Comment
-
Remy - I know this has been discussed
What is the official loan end date. Why is he not able to play? Is it a registration concern? Just wondering. No one has specified which rule stops him from playing now Newcastle season is finished. Couldn't we recall him?Comment
-
Just waiting on the press conference from harry to see if hes playing or not. Fingers crossed.
Comment
-
I reckon even if he was able to play he would choose not to.
he will want to be fit for WC.
Either way this is a non-topic already been stated by Ian Taylor that he can't feature, nor can Taarabt or anybody else on loan.Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
Lovejoy: "No?!"
Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"
Please Follow My TwitterComment
-
even if we could recall him, could open a whole can of worms within the squad if he played in the final.Comment
-
Originally posted by Kevin Mcleod View PostJust waiting on the press conference from harry to see if hes playing or not. Fingers crossed.
Comment
Comment