Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

fernandes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The amount of IFS on this thread is ridiculous.. Tony and shareholders aint going anywhere soon so I don't know what anyone is worried about.

    He wouldn't leave after 2-3 seasons and none of the shareholders would leave knowing we'd be in the sh1t. Their credible businessman who have reputations, knowledge and heart. This whole thread is TOTALLY pointless. I'm not sure why you would waste your whole evening commenting on IFS and BUTS Geng.. But.. you did

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ollyhoops View Post
      Richard and Dave,
      I think you both misunderstood my post, I'm actually for a new stadium that can be used for other events as QPR can't survive on current home gates.
      40,000 won't be open for matchdays, thats more for the concerts etc.
      I did add some humour with Take That :-)
      Apologies Olly ...

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Hitman34 View Post
        got some bad news for you dave.

        been told that ephraim and swp still have another year to run. swp signed a 4 year deal. not 100% sure that luke youngs contract runs out this year either.
        I went on a site that said they were up in the summer....http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/sp...4.html...apols if this a c**p site
        His wiki page says 3 years

        Comment


        • I believe the new ground will be owned by some of the Board members, not by QPR. Any revenue from concerts and other events will therefore belong to them, not to QPR, as QPR will just be tenants. However, it is the prospect of this extra revenue that makes building the new stadium viable in the first place.

          That is how I understand it anyway. It isn't great that we won't own our own stadium any more, but the consequences of not moving could be worse, depending on your point of view.
          'Only a Ranger!' cried Gandalf. 'My dear Frodo, that is just what the Rangers are: the last remnant in the South of the great people, the Men of West London.' - Lord of the Rings, Book II, Chapter I - Many Meetings.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by dsqpr View Post
            I believe the new ground will be owned by some of the Board members, not by QPR. Any revenue from concerts and other events will therefore belong to them, not to QPR, as QPR will just be tenants. However, it is the prospect of this extra revenue that makes building the new stadium viable in the first place.

            That is how I understand it anyway. It isn't great that we won't own our own stadium any more, but the consequences of not moving could be worse, depending on your point of view.
            I think QPR Holdings will be structured something like Arsenal's:

            Arsenal Holdings plc wholly owns twelve subsidiary companies, covering the group's activities. These include Arsenal Football Club plc (the football club itself), Arsenal (Emirates Stadium) Limited (which develops and owns Arsenal's Emirates Stadium), Arsenal Stadium Management Company (which manages the stadium on matchdays), and Arsenal Overseas Ltd (which manages retail operations). Other subsidiaries deal with property development on the site of Arsenal's former stadium at Highbury and the associated property holding and financing.
            Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

            Comment

            Working...
            X