Did you want Harry as manager?

[Kevin Mcleod]

Me thinks he doth protest too much - you can dress it up any way you want fella - you are Marshy and you are walking a very fine line

Shout Leeds and see if he turns around.

[Bluehoop]

Shout Leeds and see if he turns around.

precisely the reason (well one of them) he will deny who he is - I can't remember if he said just promoted or Champions but either way you have to chuckle

[brightonr]

Brighton, what's with this Marshy business? Is everyone who posts that daveqpr doesn't agree with either Marshy, Foolham or Chelski?

"Every QPR fan and his dog" doesn't suggest it was a figure of speech, it suggests that apart from a very tiny minority, every QPR fan wanted Harry. So I wanted to create this poll to find out whether this is true.

I am sorry you don't find this a useful poll, but I do, and I wish people would respect that. Imagine if people complained and tried to stop others from doing something just because they didn't like it.

It is also unfair to say I am ranting about one subject (Harry) alone. I have discussed TF and whether he has the right vision to lead us forward. I have discussed Adel Taarabt and whether it was a wise decision to let him go for a set fee. I have discussed Park many times, and whether he was a good player when he joined us or past it. I have discussed Hoilett, and why he became so rubbish. Amongst other things.

As a moderator I think your job should be (and I am sure you will agree) to be fair and allow honest debate. If a vocal minority start complaining, instead of saying I am getting on people's nerves, maybe you should tell this vocal minority to put me on their Ignore List? I mean, let's be honest, it is hardly as if I am going around polluting every thread with my opinions. Most of what I write is confined to my own threads, and even then, it is a few posts per day.

Thanks.

It is quite clear to me and others that yourself and the former poster Marshy, are one and the same person. One only has to read posts from both of you to know this to be the case.

So, I will repeat one last time. Please note the "one last time" part. Stop with your antagonistic responses to other posters. They have different views to you. I happen to want Harry to resign as I think he has been awful for us since his arrival. Regardless of that, it doesn't mean I need to go on a mission to change the minds of others, or as you seem to want to do, prove them wrong.

Why can you not simply adopt a different approach to this board? Discuss your views with others, on the basis that their views are as valid as yours. Have a bit of fun and don't be so serious all the time. That is the way most go about things and why they have been around for years and enjoy remaining here.

Try it. Trust me, it will stop the tag of Banned from appearing under your user name. Hope this is clear and not open to any form of misinterpretation.

[brightonr]

Shout Leeds and see if he turns around.

Now that is my idea of humour.

[LanguedocFox]

It is an interesting question, although you guys must be fed up with variations on the theme of "Don't want/didn't want/did want but not now". I remember quite clearly watching your match against Southampton on MoTD, and seeing Mark Hughes as dead-man walking, with banners saying "Save us Harry" (eg, http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/f...p-8327282.html, which is one of many similar reports).

As I've said before on here, I've never been a fan of changing managers in mid-season: City has tried it on loads of occasions, and it's rarely worked. Having said that, I really don't think Hughes has ever proved anything as a manager, and he should have been fired after his first half-season in charge, when QPR ended up in 17th place: you'll doubtless recall that Fernandes sacked Neil Walnut because QPR had "slipped down to a dangerous league position" - which was 17th.

I'm not going to vote in BushLover's poll, for obvious reasons: although, if I had been a QPR fan, I would not have wanted him as a manager.

[Marshy]

precisely the reason (well one of them) he will deny who he is - I can't remember if he said just promoted or Champions but either way you have to chuckle

Why will I deny who I am? I am an honest person and if you want to ask me a question, you can ask me, and I will answer.

[Marshy]

It is quite clear to me and others that yourself and the former poster Marshy, are one and the same person. One only has to read posts from both of you to know this to be the case.

So, I will repeat one last time. Please note the "one last time" part. Stop with your antagonistic responses to other posters. They have different views to you. I happen to want Harry to resign as I think he has been awful for us since his arrival. Regardless of that, it doesn't mean I need to go on a mission to change the minds of others, or as you seem to want to do, prove them wrong.

Why can you not simply adopt a different approach to this board? Discuss your views with others, on the basis that their views are as valid as yours. Have a bit of fun and don't be so serious all the time. That is the way most go about things and why they have been around for years and enjoy remaining here.

Try it. Trust me, it will stop the tag of Banned from appearing under your user name. Hope this is clear and not open to any form of misinterpretation.

As far as I can remember Marshy used to be quite an aggressive type who would take anyone on? Me? I have been trying to ignore the people who are intent on trying to provoke me.

I am sad you didn't address any of my points. Like how others can ignore me. Like how I am not ranting about just one topic. And how you choose to ignore that OTHERS have been calling ME names, and DISRESPECTING my views, but that seems to be ok, not even a warning for people like rickyranger who was calling me "clueless", but the moment I say to someone they don't know what they're on about, I am suddenly the bad person who doesn't respect the opinions of others.

Anyway mate, you go ahead and do what you have to. If you want to ban me, then that's fair play, I am sure daveqpr and some others will do some ^5s, and people can go back to discussing how great Harry is. But you'll need to ask yourself whether this is the kind of forum you really want to have, where a vocal minority can start complaining about a poster who is largely staying in his own threads, and get him banned. Is this really the type of forum you and the other moderators want to exist?
At the end of the day, whether you ban me or not won't really change the important things in my life, I'll still have a job, I'll still have the worries I have today, there will still be war in the world, people will still be dying of diseases and starvation, and QPR will still not get promoted until Harry goes. Life is short and I don't want to spend it here getting antagonised because some people decided they didn't like some threads I started and came and started arguing with me.

[lymehoop]

Why will I deny who I am? I am an honest person and if you want to ask me a question, you can ask me, and I will answer.

what was your previous username and where is the Malaysian aircraft?

[Marshy]

what was your previous username and where is the Malaysian aircraft?

I can't remember. I think it was MarshyRocks or something similar. And somewhere in the ocean - I think.

[QPRDave]

Why will I deny who I am? I am an honest person and if you want to ask me a question, you can ask me, and I will answer.

When did you start supporting QPR?

[Marshy]

When did you start supporting QPR?

When there was talk of Fulham Park Rangers

[QPRDave]

how old were you then?

[brightonr]

As far as I can remember Marshy used to be quite an aggressive type who would take anyone on? Me? I have been trying to ignore the people who are intent on trying to provoke me.

I am sad you didn't address any of my points. Like how others can ignore me. Like how I am not ranting about just one topic. And how you choose to ignore that OTHERS have been calling ME names, and DISRESPECTING my views, but that seems to be ok, not even a warning for people like rickyranger who was calling me "clueless", but the moment I say to someone they don't know what they're on about, I am suddenly the bad person who doesn't respect the opinions of others.

Anyway mate, you go ahead and do what you have to. If you want to ban me, then that's fair play, I am sure daveqpr and some others will do some ^5s, and people can go back to discussing how great Harry is. But you'll need to ask yourself whether this is the kind of forum you really want to have, where a vocal minority can start complaining about a poster who is largely staying in his own threads, and get him banned. Is this really the type of forum you and the other moderators want to exist?
At the end of the day, whether you ban me or not won't really change the important things in my life, I'll still have a job, I'll still have the worries I have today, there will still be war in the world, people will still be dying of diseases and starvation, and QPR will still not get promoted until Harry goes. Life is short and I don't want to spend it here getting antagonised because some people decided they didn't like some threads I started and came and started arguing with me.

I've asked you to change the way you go about things. Choice is yours.

[Kirill]

I hang my head in shame: I did want Harry. Just like I did want that vocalist from Tokyo Hotel after watching a clip but before realising the terrible truth about that person's gender.

[QPRDave]

How old were you when you started supporting Rangers bush?