If in one of our games a ref gives the other team a dubious decision, e.g blatant offside goal, penalty, sending off, and then realises his mistake, should he unofficially recompense with some sort of evener for us? This question came up again in last night's Barca - City game and the commentator answered his own question by saying no.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do two wrongs make a right?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by brightonr View PostWould be far better if he took more time to make the right decision in the first place. Doesn't have to be made in one second.
Personally I would only like it used for two occasions- to see if the balls over the line and for diving (I absolutely hate it when a player dives. They should be given a straight red card as its blatant cheating).SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nick View PostHow about a video referee like they use in rugby?
Personally I would only like it used for two occasions- to see if the balls over the line and for diving (I absolutely hate it when a player dives. They should be given a straight red card as its blatant cheating).Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.
Comment
-
I think the problem is, once you start on the slippery slope of allowing reviews of one aspect of the game, what is the argument against the others? It could end up an absolute nightmare. Having said that, I see no reason why the fourth official cannot be watching and rewinding incidents where there is doubt and act accordingly. It would be nice if all aspects of cheating were dealt with harshly such as a minimum of a yellow card, but even a red. So irritating when a bloke kicks the ball out and immediately puts his arm up, claiming a throw in.
Sorry Greengrass, I strayed a bit. In answer to your question, No. Never.
Comment
Comment