Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Harry clueless ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Harry clueless ?

    http://www.sportinglife.com/football.../360/9195478/- reads ..


    It would be a fairly spectacular understatement to say that the Sky Bet Championship is an unpredictable division.

    Watford narrowly missed out on promotion twice last season (once automatically, once through the play-offs), but have spent much of this term nervously looking down rather than hopefully looking up. Leicester spent years throwing money at every conceivable problem, but after spending virtually nothing last summer, they're now by a distance the best team in the league. Burnley sold their best player, didn't sign anyone to replace him and are second.

    This chaos is most neatly summed up by QPR, who began the season with a squad that looked stronger on paper than half a dozen teams in the Premier League, and with a manager who narrowly missed out on the England job, having taken Tottenham to fourth, fifth then fourth in his last three seasons there. They should, in theory, be the team 13 points clear of second place, rather than Leicester.

    As it is, they are in fourth and, if their current form doesn't turn round pretty dramatically and pretty quickly, they are more likely to slip out of the top six than jump back into the top two. It was therefore not a massive surprise that stories emerged in the press (most notably The Times, not a paper prone to hyperbole in these things) that the QPR board were at least considering making a change.

    Redknapp was, of course, bullish in his rebuttal of such talk. "There is always somebody who people talk to and they don't like you and want to stick the boot in," he told TalkSPORT, whose presenter admirably managed to stop themselves bursting into fits of laughter at the idea of Redknapp complaining that the press might harm his career.

    "This is the first blip we've had all season, it can happen. We have put a new team together and if you said at the start of the season that we'd make the play-offs, we'd have been quite happy."

    Redknapp cannot possibly think that, given the investment made and the experience in his squad, anything other than a rapid return to the Premier League was acceptable to the Rangers hierarchy. Obviously his words were an attempt at self-preservation, but his assertion that the naysaying only stems from QPR's recent run (they have collected just two points from the last five games) is misleading.

    Championship

    1 Leicester 74
    2 Burnley 66
    3 Derby 61
    4 QPR 57
    5 N Forest 55
    6 Wigan 52
    7 Reading 51
    8 Brighton 49
    9 Ipswich 48
    10 Blackburn 46
    11 Watford 45
    12 Leeds 44
    13 Huddersfld 43
    14 Middlesbro' 40
    15 Sheff Wed 39
    16 Bournemth 39
    17 Birmingham 36
    18 Bolton 36
    19 Blackpool 35
    20 Doncaster 30
    21 Millwall 28
    22 Charlton 27
    23 Yeovil 26
    24 Barnsley 26

    last updated 03/03 16:18

    QPR have in fact been living off their outstanding start to the season for a couple of months now. Since the start of December, they have won six from 15, collecting 22 points from a possible 45, a points-per-game ratio that if applied to a full season would give 67 points, a total only enough for eighth place last season and one that Leicester reached after 29 games this term. They have scored just 38 goals, fewer than any team bar one in the top half, and fewer than Bolton, who are in 18th place.

    Redknapp also points to injuries, especially to top-scorer Charlie Austin, and squad turnover (18 players left in the summer while 19 came in) for their sluggish performance, which are both understandable excuses, but again both are misleading.

    The change in personnel is of course a problem, but logically one would think that would only be an issue at the start of the campaign, when the high turnover would make it difficult to knit a team together. However, QPR won nine and drew two of their opening 11 games, which would seem to suggest this was not the case, and Redknapp actually dealt with the churn pretty well, so to blame it for their latter struggles does not make much sense.

    The injury situation is another that Redknapp seems to have exaggerated the impact of. Niko Kranjcar, Benoit Assou-Ekotto, Gary O'Neil, Bobby Zamora, Charlie Austin, Matt Phillips and Danny Simpson all missed the draw against Leeds at the weekend, and Joey Barton was suspended, but Redknapp was still able to field a team that, including the three substitutes, had 354 international caps between them. Every team suffers with injuries, but few in the Championship are so well-equipped to deal with them as QPR.

    Austin's shoulder injury, which Redknapp is now more optimistic about after initially predicting he would miss the rest of the season, is of course a blow, but his absence merely serves to highlight how over-reliant QPR were on him for goals. Austin has 14 league goals to his name, and their next highest scorer is Matt Phillips, who has three, then six other players have two apiece.

    A neat summary of QPR's situation came when they recruited Ravel Morrison from West Ham on an 'emergency' loan. All but one or two other clubs in the division would mend and make do when faced with injury problems - QPR spent who knows how much on the wages of a player touted for the England World Cup squad not too long ago.

    The play-offs would not be a disaster. After all, West Ham used that route to go up in 2012 when in a similar position and they're doing well now, but QPR really should not be in this situation. Given their resources, if QPR do not win promotion this season, Redknapp will have failed, no matter how many excuses he gives.

  • #2
    Good article dont think they're far wrong? Harry should have got this squad up no problems it was his fault that we relied on Austin so much not bringing in another descent striker at the start of the season?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by dave58 View Post
      Good article dont think they're far wrong? Harry should have got this squad up no problems it was his fault that we relied on Austin so much not bringing in another descent striker at the start of the season?
      Who should Harry of bought in? Who was actually available? How much did Harry have to spend?

      I agree we should of bought at least one other striker in and it was mad that we were relying so much on one player. But I don't think it was simple as just go out and bring someone in.
      SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!

      Comment


      • #4
        Very true but did he not try to bring in those other two strikers from abroad - who knows what that may have brought to the table

        That still doesn't excuse him ... those positions should still have been properly addressed. Doyle and Hughes were not the answer.

        Most fans have been more than aware that our striking options have been limited for some time now

        Where HR really went wrong, IMO, is that he held too much faith in Zamora and johnson which has proved to be flawed...

        Zamora was finished as we all knew but Harry couldn't see it, and Johnson makes Mathew Rose look like Iron man.... there lied the problem.

        Had the striker issue been addressed earlier, much earlier, we would now be sitting where Leicester are.

        It was all so painfully obvious for all to see - Harry is the professional, why didn't he see it...

        Buck has to stop with him I'm afraid.
        Last edited by skranger; 04-03-2014, 10:56 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          The other irony is, we have a QPR striker ripping it up in the premiership .... you almost couldn't make it up...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by skranger View Post
            Very true but did he not try to bring in those other two strikers from abroad - who knows what that may have brought to the table

            That still doesn't excuse him ... those positions should still have been properly addressed. Doyle and Hughes were not the answer.

            Most fans have been more than aware that our striking options have been limited for some time now

            Where HR really went wrong, IMO, is that he held too much faith in Zamora and johnson which has proved to be flawed...

            Zamora was finished as we all knew but Harry couldn't see it and Johnson makes Mathew Rose look like Iron man.... there lied the problem.

            Had the striker issue been addressed earlier, much earlier, we would now be sitting where Leicester are.

            It was all so painfully obvious for all to see - Harry is the professional, why didn't he see it...

            Buck has to stop with him I'm afraid.
            He held way to much faith in AJ and Zamora, that was the cause of our blip this season. With all the work Austin was doing, he was an accident waiting to happen and it was only a matter of time before he got a serious injury. IMO had there been another decent striker to help out, Austin would still be playing and banging them in...

            So I more than agree HR focked up by putting so much faith in 2 injury prone strikers.. But just how easy would've it been to bring other's in??
            Plus you make a good point that we did try to bring a couple of strikers in but the deals fell through.
            SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!

            Comment


            • #7
              I think Nick, most fans will be singing from the same song sheet about this -

              We should not be in the position now scraping around with (no disrespect) second rate strikers..

              We are now paying the price for our naivety

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by skranger View Post
                I think Nick, most fans will be singing from the same song sheet about this -

                We should not be in the position now scraping around with (no disrespect) second rate strikers..

                We are now paying the price for our naivety
                Spot on mate.
                SIR LESLIE FERDINAND!!

                Comment


                • #9
                  In addition to what the article pointed out, he has messed it up even more by playing "fit" players in wrong positions, trusted the wrong players and on top of that showed zero tactical skills, given the youth a cold shoulder etc,etc.

                  IMO, It´s time to retire, Harry.
                  Last edited by Shania; 04-03-2014, 11:31 AM.
                  QPR
                  Best team in the world
                  Sort of

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Shania, we could go on ...

                    Question is - What now ??

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Well, he still says he is the man to get us up. Personally, I´m not sure about that, but It looks like TF is willing to give him that chance??
                      Bottomline; TF is god, as far as Our Money is concerned..If will be an expensive solution to sack yet another manager now.
                      Last edited by Shania; 04-03-2014, 11:47 AM.
                      QPR
                      Best team in the world
                      Sort of

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        In Harry we trust, or something

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Rebel R's View Post
                          In Harry we trust, or something
                          Or do we Rebel .... Even the most pro Harry supporters must be questioning..

                          Me personally am undecided but leaning towards no confidence, I said leaning

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Yes Harry should have one better. His biggest mistake was reliance on Charlie Austin. Knowing that Johnson and Zamora are injury prone, he should've brought another striker.
                            QPR fan since1987

                            @yousef_qpr

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Nick View Post
                              Who should Harry of bought in? Who was actually available? How much did Harry have to spend?

                              I agree we should of bought at least one other striker in and it was mad that we were relying so much on one player. But I don't think it was simple as just go out and bring someone in.
                              Gary Holt, Danny Graham. He could have also kept Jay Bothroyd for one season. I think he wasn't bad when he played some games last season.
                              QPR fan since1987

                              @yousef_qpr

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X