Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

QPR - the "has beens" XI

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by KentHoopNSV View Post
    At their peak they'd've been a half decent Prem side dont ya think?
    Without a doubt kent

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Joon View Post
      I won't have yet another protracted discussion about Park, but to really qualify for this list, should not the player have proven himself useless this season as well, either due to endless injury or permanent degradation of abilities/form? Since Park has been consistently putting in MOTM performances at PSV this season, he really does not belong on this list. He only had one bad season in his career, and that was with us last season when pretty much the whole team was a nonworking heap of complete disarray, with Remy being perhaps the only player in the attacking half of the pitch that performed. One bad season after eleven or twelve good seasons, followed up by yet another good season, if you were being honest about it, you could not classify him a has-been, not yet anyway.

      Contrast that with all the others on the above list. Park should not be on the list much less rank #2 by any measure other than the fact that he was the most successful prior to his one bad season.

      That's all I have time for. Probably for the best anyway.
      I don't really know Park has been doing at PSV - are you sure those MOTM aren't voted by fans, because if they are then we all know a million Koreans would give Park a 10 and thus they'd be meaningless.

      Anyway, Park was rubbish for us, and I think he is a shadow of the player he was. You see, I think Park was a very effective player in a limited role. He might still be decent for PSV, but I doubt he is the player he was 6 years ago, so that's why he is a "has been" in my book.

      Comment

      Working...
      X