Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Radio transcipt of piquet crash

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Radio transcipt of piquet crash

    MAKE YOUR OWN MIND UP

    HARDLY "KILLER" EVIDENCE

    From The Times September 15, 2009


    Today The Times can reveal extracts from the radio conversations between key Renault personnel during last year’s controversial Singapore Grand Prix leading up to, and including, the moment when Nelson Piquet Jr crashed on lap 14.

    This radio traffic between the Renault pitwall and Piquet, as well as among members of the pitwall, is a fascinating insight into the minutes leading up to the crash and the chaotic moments after it.

    The transcript will form part of the FIA’s World Motor Sport Council’s deliberations on Monday when it decides whether Piquet was told to crash his car, an allegation Renault and Flavio Briatore, the team principal, deny.

    The Renault group on the wall at races includes two race engineers, plus Briatore and Pat Symonds, the director of engineering who runs the management of the race.

    Symonds has been offered immunity from prosecution by the FIA in return for full disclosure about the alleged scheme to have Piquet crash on purpose.

    The aim of the conspiracy alleged by the FIA was for Renault to cause a safety car interruption immediately after Fernando Alonso, who has said he was not party to any scheme to cheat, had made an unscheduled and early pitstop. Alonso pitted on lap 12 of the race, four laps earlier than originally intended, and Piquet’s car hit the wall two laps later.

    The safety car duly appeared and circulated for six laps. During that time almost all of Alonso’s rivals pitted, enabling the Spaniard to climb steadily through the field and win the race from fifteenth on the grid.

    In the early part of the race, there were several exchanges between Symonds and the engineers about Alonso’s race strategy, with Symonds preparing the ground to drop the original three-stop approach and change it to a two-stop strategy that would better fit with any plan for Piquet to crash.

    “I can tell you now we are not three-stopping,” Symonds is heard to say on the transcript made by the FIA as part of its evidence in the case, a copy of which has been seen by The Times.

    Later Symonds adds to an unnamed engineer: “Don’t worry about fuel because I’m going to get him [Alonso] out of this traffic earlier than that.”

    Not long afterwards comes an unusual intervention from Piquet, who was running towards the back of the field in the early stages of Formula One’s first night race. But the novelty factor for him was not the floodlights. It has now been suggested that he was worried about which lap he was on because he knew he had special instructions for lap 14.

    Piquet says: “What lap are we in, what lap are we in?”

    A few seconds later an engineer tells the others on the wall: “He just asked: ‘What lap are we in?’ ”

    Symonds intervenes: “Yeah, tell him that he’s about to complete lap 8.”

    Symonds insists Piquet is then told something he should know from his pitboard, which is shown to him at the end of every lap. “No, just tell him, he is about, he’s just completing, he’s about to complete lap eight.”

    After Piquet is given the information, the discussion returns to the timing of Alonso’s first stop and Symonds makes his decision. “Right, I’m going to . . . I think we’re going to stop him just before we catch him [a reference to the Williams driver, Kazuki Nakajima, who was ahead of Alonso] and get him out of it, the reason being we’ve still got this worry on the fuel pump. It’s only a couple of laps short. We’re going to be stopping him early and we’re going to go to lap 40.”

    This decision prompts an engineer, who wants assurance from Symonds that a tactical option that would drop Alonso to last is the right thing to do. “Pat, do you still not think that this is a bit too early?” he asks a few minutes later. “We only did six tenths that lap.”

    Symonds replies: “No, no it’s going to be all right.”

    “OK, OK, understood,” the engineer responds.

    Once Alonso has made his stop, Symonds tells everybody that it is time to “concentrate on” Piquet. After assessing the Brazilian’s position, he and Briatore decide Piquet has to quicken up as the fateful lap draws near.

    Symonds to the engineer: “OK right, you’ve got to push him really bloody hard now. If he doesn’t get past Barrichello, he’s going nowhere, he’s got to get past Barrichello this lap.”

    “Tell him, push . . .,” Briatore says.

    Piquet’s race engineer gives him the hurry-up: “Nelson, no excuses now, you’ve got to get past Barrichello. You’ve got four clicks straight-line advantage. Come on, you’ve got to push now, you must get past him.”

    Moments later Piquet crashes at turn 17, where there are no cranes to lift the wreckage, making a safety car inevitable, and at the point at which he alleges Symonds told him to do the deed during a meeting before the race.

    Multiple voices: “Nelson’s off. F***ing hell. Nelson’s had a crash. I would say that would be a red flag. It’s huge [all speaking at the same time] .

    Piquet: “Sorry guys. I had a little outing.”

    Engineer: “Is he all right, Is he all right?”

    Symonds: “Ask him if he’s all right.”

    Engineer: “Are you OK? Are you OK?”

    Engineer: “Fernando’s just gone past it.”

    Engineer: “OK, yellow flag.”

    Piquet: “Yeah, I hit my head in the back. I think I’m OK.”

    Engineer: “OK, understood.”

    Symonds: “Right [inaudible], stop him.”

    Engineer: “Safety car, safety car, safety car, safety car. Fernando, safety car, mixture three.”

    Symonds: “Tell him to be careful, turn 17 I think it is.”

    After several exchanges about Alonso, an engineer expresses concern, presumably after seeing the crash on the television monitor, but Briatore seems unconcerned and is angry with Piquet.

    Engineer: “F***ing hell that was a big shunt.”

    Briatore: “F***ing hell . . . my every f***ing disgrace, f***ing, he’s not a driver.”

    Then Symonds asks about Alonso’s suddenly improving prospects.

    Symonds: “What position is Fernando in?”

    Engineer: “Well, we were 20, and we’re first guy to pick the safety car up.”

    Symonds: “Yeah, we’re not . . .”

    Engineer: “He will get away past it but he’s got to wait.”

    Later Briatore and Symonds discuss Alonso’s chances. “What position we are now in all this?” asks Briatore.

    Symonds replies: “To be honest, I don’t know Flavio. It’s got to have been good for Fernando. But I honestly don’t know where he is.”

    In the final part of the transcript, several minutes after the crash, the Renault team return to the subject of Piquet and his condition and at this stage Briatore adds his own concern for the young Brazilian driver’s welfare.

    Engineer: “Where is Nelson? Have you seen him?”

    Briatore: “Is he OK, Nelson? Is he OK?”

    Alonso: “The pitlane is closed until we arrive?”

    Engineer: “He climbed out, mate, and ran across the track.”

    Engineer: “Yeah, the pitlane is still closed.”

    Taken as a whole the transcript does not provide a killer-blow against Symonds or Briatore and could be read either way.

    The FIA, the sport’s governing body, is known to be particularly concerned that the alleged conspiracy not only amounted to cheating but also involved a reckless act that could have resulted in injury or loss of life.

    The pitwall recording shows that, on this score, the Renault team were also extremely concerned about Piquet’s safety.

  • #2
    erm, where/when is he told to crash?

    Comment


    • #3
      I agree with you and feel they have been advised to quit, I would have stood my ground.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by SirLes View Post
        erm, where/when is he told to crash?
        Since the team radio feeds are open to scrutiny by race officials, etc. it is hardly likely that they are going to come out and say "Nelson, can you crash into the wall like we discussed earlier" is it?

        They have been accused of being cheats, nobody said they were stupid....
        A message to the other Premier League clubs when they visit Loftus Road.....

        "NUESTRA GLORIA, VUESTRO INFIERNO"

        (If you don't understand it, then learn Spanish. It is the language of world football.....)

        Comment


        • #5
          Another interesting thing is that Symonds declined immunity to testify

          Comment


          • #6
            Could it be that he was going to accept blame to protect his boss ?

            Comment


            • #7
              PK should stick to selling peanuts

              Needs to blame someone for the crap driving!

              Comment


              • #8
                Eddie Jordan believes there must have been "clear-cut evidence" of wrongdoing at Renault for Flavio Briatore and Pat Symonds to leave and the team to drop their challenge against allegations they attempted to manipulate the result of the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.

                It was alleged that managing director Briatore and executive director of engineering Symonds conspired with then driver Nelson Piquet Jnr to cause a crash at last year's race.

                Despite Briatore's assertion during last weekend's Italian Grand Prix that there had been no offence committed, the departure of Briatore and Symonds would now appear to point to their guilt.

                Former team owner Jordan told BBC Radio Five Live: "The FIA seemed to have clear-cut evidence that what is alleged is what has actually happened.

                "And as a result of today, with the standing down of these two people, or Renault letting them go, I get the impression there was clear-cut evidence that it was no longer tenable that they could stay in.

                "Renault, by suggesting they're not going to contest the allegation, it is in itself an admission - or that's how I see it. Legally there may be a different argument of course.

                "But as a normal person on the street I think this is a clear-cut admission and I am surprised."

                Jordan added: "This is a story that even in your mindset you couldn't set up.

                "How would you go to tell a driver, 'Look if you want to keep your seat you've got to do this'.

                "The ramifications with the safety, safety of the marshals, the safety of the driver ... you're asking someone to do something that is absolutely ridiculous.

                "I ran a team for nearly 30 years and I can't comprehend that is even part of the agenda.

                "I don't know how desperate they were.

                "In the Jordan team you could contemplate all sorts of things but certainly you wouldn't contemplate that."

                Jordan does not expect Renault to be thrown out of Formula One, suggesting the departure of two of the team's top men may have been part of "a pact".

                Discussing Italian businessman Briatore, who is a co-owner of Coca-Cola Championship club QPR, Jordan said: "While he's a good guy socially and well respected, now people will look on it in a different way.

                "Will the FA allow him to continue to run a club?

                "The ramifications in this for Flavio are very extreme, very difficult, and he will be devastated by what he's had to do."

                Former grand prix winner John Watson believes the position of both Symonds and Briatore at the Anglo-French team had become untenable.

                "I think the fact that Flavio Briatore and Pat Symonds have left the team was the only solution to Renault," Watson told BBC Radio Five Live.

                "There's no question about 'did they jump?' - they were clearly pushed out.

                "A company on the scale of Renault, a world-scale motor company... could not afford to have a scandal of this magnitude rattling around in the boardroom.

                "It was just totally untenable. There was no option from what I've seen."

                Watson, who won five races in a 13-year F1 career between 1973 and 1985, also believes the role played by Piquet Jnr in the saga should not be overlooked.

                "Had they not dropped Piquet, we would not know about this story," he continued.

                "The integrity of that family is called into dispute as much as it is about the principals of Renault instigating the thing in the first place."

                Comment

                Working...
                X