The chief should be playing every game H.R need to realise the he's much better than Clint who very. Limited all thought a great clubman who's been brilliant and he's the club at heart,
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Onuoha
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Nick View PostDread to think what will happen if Austin comes back and has a bad game....
Comment
-
Originally posted by RivieraR View PostDid you watch the game against Burnely. Surely that might give a bit of insight. he was consistently nowhere near his man.
It is a tricky issue for me. Dunne and Clint have been very good this year, but are strating to look tired and the clean sheets are not so regular.
IMO, Ned is far superior to either of them at CB and should be a definite starter if and when fit.You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MattyRangers View PostHill and Dunne were beaten to the ball by their me for 2 of the goals that day.
IMO, Ned is far superior to either of them at CB and should be a definite starter if and when fit.
This is one of many reasons why I question the gaffer´s ability to judge a player´s abilty.QPR
Best team in the world
Sort of
Comment
-
Originally posted by rickyranger View PostJust don't understand why Redknapp doesn't play him, has the pace we so badely need at the back which in turn allows us to play a higher line giving our strikers more support and options.
Before all the Hill/Dunne combo fans state what a great defense we have, yes they have done well and give their all but the facts suggest we are better with Onuoha.
With Onuoha at Centre back, played 11 conceeded 4 goals at 0.363 per game averaging 2.18 points per game and remain undefeated.
With the Hill/Dunne combo, played 18 conceeded 17 goals at 0.944 per game averaging 1.72 points per game and suffering 5 defeats.
Has to play whenever fit replacing either of Hill or Dunne but there again Arry has his favourites whatever the evidence to the contrary.
Comment
-
Ned is a must in the team. But I wouldn't change the back four. Instead, Ned will play in front of the back four, just like Derry used to play. It will make us more solid at the back. It worries me that apart from the problem of goals, we are starting to concede as well. We need to tighten at the back, that's how we found ourselves in the position we are in. We cannot go all out attacking, as we do not have the quality to open up defences, and instead, its our defence that's struggling to cope with CCC tempo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MattyRangers View PostHill and Dunne were beaten to the ball by their me for 2 of the goals that day.
IMO, Ned is far superior to either of them at CB and should be a definite starter if and when fit.
I would put him back at CB alongside either Hill or Dunne.
This also gives the defence a chance to play further up the field allowing the midfield to get closer to the fowards so that QPR pose a bigger attacking threat. With Hill and Dunne, the defence and midfield are playing far too deep leaving the forwards isolated.
Comment
-
So the record with hill and Dunne together now reads played 19 conceded 20 average of 1.05 per game with 6 defeats and a average of 1.63 points per game.
With Onhuora in the side played 11 conceded 4 average of 0.363 per game no defeats and 2.18 points per game.
Hopefully Redknapp will finally see what any decent manager and anyone who knows football has seen for weeks one of hill/Dunne needs to be dropped and Onhuora played.
Comment
Comment