Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2 strikers tonight

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I'll bet you any money you like he's one of the most cosistant penalty scorers at the club, so he'd still be our main pen taker. I also believe he's one of very few who will always give it 100% and very effectfully. He is a good passer of the ball and can score from long range. Never shy of getting stuck in and does exactly what the team needs. I'll wager that if players like Buzz could chose someone to opperate next to, Rowly would be very high on their list.
    Your mum would love me...

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by BennyBoyRs View Post
      I'll bet you any money you like he's one of the most cosistant penalty scorers at the club, so he'd still be our main pen taker. I also believe he's one of very few who will always give it 100% and very effectfully. He is a good passer of the ball and can score from long range. Never shy of getting stuck in and does exactly what the team needs. I'll wager that if players like Buzz could chose someone to opperate next to, Rowly would be very high on their list.
      I never questioned that he didnt give 100%. Of course he does, so would I, doesnt mean I should start center mid. Thats the very minimum I expect from a professional football player.

      How many does he really score from long range? A cracker versus Wolves last season is all I can remember. Although in fairness he did miss 3 months with an injury. What other long rangers has he scored, say from the last 3 seasons?

      Comment


      • #33
        Just for you Morris, I'll do a bit more researc later and let you know the exact games.

        Off the top of my head, Suderland away, Leicester at home, Palace at home and Stoke were all good strikes from distance, but I'm sure there are more.
        Your mum would love me...

        Comment


        • #34
          Morris I agree with you.
          No place in the side for Rowlands.
          I would have watson and Buzz in the middle but I want to play 2 upfront.
          Now that helguson has left I can't see who can play upfront with Simpson so I would stick buzz just behind simpson. Rowlands or Fraulin is a tricky one as Rowlands does give a commited performance so I may start him.
          I played sunday league football today.

          Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

          I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

          We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by WeAreQPR12 View Post
            Morris I agree with you.
            No place in the side for Rowlands.
            I would have watson and Buzz in the middle but I want to play 2 upfront.
            Now that helguson has left I can't see who can play upfront with Simpson so I would stick buzz just behind simpson. Rowlands or Fraulin is a tricky one as Rowlands does give a commited performance so I may start him.
            Finally.

            At least I know im not going crazy.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by WeAreQPR12 View Post
              Morris I agree with you.
              No place in the side for Rowlands.
              I would have watson and Buzz in the middle but I want to play 2 upfront.
              Now that helguson has left I can't see who can play upfront with Simpson so I would stick buzz just behind simpson. Rowlands or Fraulin is a tricky one as Rowlands does give a commited performance so I may start him.
              Me too.
              I think they'd work very well together, and should be given the time to form a CM partnership.

              I wont hold my breath on that though.

              Comment


              • #37
                Halleujah!

                Comment


                • #38
                  Both too offensive. If Watson goes forward Buszaky will not sit back and cover.

                  If they are to play together in CM a holding player has to be used as otherwise teams will run straight through the middle of our team.

                  They can only play together in a 4-5-1 formation.
                  15 years in the wilderness will be a distant memory come Sunday 8th May 2011.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Ads1985 View Post
                    Both too offensive. If Watson goes forward Buszaky will not sit back and cover.

                    If they are to play together in CM a holding player has to be used as otherwise teams will run straight through the middle of our team.

                    They can only play together in a 4-5-1 formation.
                    Agree to an extent, but I think you're under valuing Watsons defensive capabilities.

                    Back to my point, Rowlands is always deserved of a place in the team. His all-round game is needed as are his leadership skills. As contradictive as it seems, Rowlands is our 3rd best CM option behind Buzz and Watson, but I feel either one of the latter mentioned would work better with Rowlands than with one another as Rowlands will allow them to get on with the forward duties.
                    Your mum would love me...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Watson can defend and get back he proved that on saturday but if we were playing a holding midfielder their player wouldn't have got that far.

                      I would have Rowlands in the team playing DM whenever he is available behind those two.
                      15 years in the wilderness will be a distant memory come Sunday 8th May 2011.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Well he tried near enough every other formation and selection so I guess he may as well go with this one then....

                        Put it this way, if it works tonight maybe he has found his winning team?

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by ollyhoops View Post
                          Well he tried near enough every other formation and selection so I guess he may as well go with this one then....

                          Put it this way, if it works tonight maybe he has found his winning team?
                          And if it doesnt hes down the jobcenter tomorrow morning, P45 in hand!!

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Rowlands wouldnt make my starting 11 either im afraid.
                            @chrisrobson9

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Sorry Scott if I am reading this wrong but is Adel on the bench?
                              If so, just as important as the whether we play Rowlands row.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Rowlands was dreadful when he came on this sat, id keep him on the bench and play faurlin. also have tarabt rather than vine.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X