Oh Pete for Christ sakes!!
You've had it explained 1,000 times, but it doesn't seem to register. (No offence meant).
It's so superficial to just blame the manager, or a few players, it goes so much deeper than that.
Ok.... Just TRY and answer this one simple question, and think about it:
Why is QPR's reputation among the LMA, the media, and football in general so low that we ended up with a very limited choice of managers... so low that we ended up with Jim Magilton???
You've admitted yourself only yesterday that our reputation is all wrong, so why the limited choice we had last time, and next time?
Do you not agree that the manager is the most important part of a football club? And were you not very dissapointed to end up with Magilton?
Why was our choice so limited?
We are seen as damaged goods, and a no-go zone by most managers. Why is that, when we are relatively wealthy, in a great location, and have always been seen as a decent club?
Think about it Pete. You KNOW why.
You've had it explained 1,000 times, but it doesn't seem to register. (No offence meant).
It's so superficial to just blame the manager, or a few players, it goes so much deeper than that.
Ok.... Just TRY and answer this one simple question, and think about it:
Why is QPR's reputation among the LMA, the media, and football in general so low that we ended up with a very limited choice of managers... so low that we ended up with Jim Magilton???
You've admitted yourself only yesterday that our reputation is all wrong, so why the limited choice we had last time, and next time?
Do you not agree that the manager is the most important part of a football club? And were you not very dissapointed to end up with Magilton?
Why was our choice so limited?
We are seen as damaged goods, and a no-go zone by most managers. Why is that, when we are relatively wealthy, in a great location, and have always been seen as a decent club?
Think about it Pete. You KNOW why.
Comment