Originally posted by themodfather
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Whats in a name
Collapse
X
-
We couldn't be just called QPR.
How many times in the future would QPR fans be asked, 'errr, what do the letters Q.P.R. stand for?'
And how many times would QPR fans have to say, 'well, they stand for Queen's Park Rangers.'
We've been Queen's Park Rangers (QPR) since 1882, and I hope it's the case in 2082 when the QPR fans of the future celebrate our Bi-centenary.
Comment
-
Times have changed but most football fans live in the past.Cricket has moved on with name changes for one day a T20 sides without all this fuss.Football fans seem to think they have a right to live in the past when the rest of the world is in the 21st century.
Get over it.
Football is not a sport anymore it's a multi billion pound business and owners will do what they think is best to market their product,and it is a product.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stan_bowles View PostTimes have changed but most football fans live in the past.Cricket has moved on with name changes for one day a T20 sides without all this fuss.Football fans seem to think they have a right to live in the past when the rest of the world is in the 21st century.
Get over it.
Football is not a sport anymore it's a multi billion pound business and owners will do what they think is best to market their product,and it is a product.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stan_bowles View PostTimes have changed but most football fans live in the past.Cricket has moved on with name changes for one day a T20 sides without all this fuss.Football fans seem to think they have a right to live in the past when the rest of the world is in the 21st century.
Get over it.
Football is not a sport anymore it's a multi billion pound business and owners will do what they think is best to market their product,and it is a product.
Comment
-
Originally posted by qblockoompah View PostDon't see what benefit we could ever have by changing names? Disrespectful to the history of the club IMO
Might not be right for most fans but it's the way it is.
And many of these new owners are bankrolling clubs that would be doing a Portsmouth or Rangers or similar.
Some here have short memories and whinge about Flavio changing the badge for example,but without him we may not even have a club now.
Fans want success and big signings etc.,but then moan if an owner wants to make changes.Can't have it all your own way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stan_bowles View PostCompanies rebrand and reinvent themselves all the time and football clubs are companies these days.
Might not be right for most fans but it's the way it is.
And many of these new owners are bankrolling clubs that would be doing a Portsmouth or Rangers or similar.
Some here have short memories and whinge about Flavio changing the badge for example,but without him we may not even have a club now.
Fans want success and big signings etc.,but then moan if an owner wants to make changes.Can't have it all your own way.
Where would our identity and 'brand recognition' be then?Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostSo you'd find it acceptable if we were called QPR one season, London Rangers the next, then the London Soccer All-Stars after that, if it's about marketing? Perhaps you think it's ok if we change our kit every now and then, from hoops to plain red and then to pink?
Where would our identity and 'brand recognition' be then?
It's a case of struggling in the lower leagues with minimal money or having to put up with the new owners pumping millions into the club and making the changes they want like Hull and Cardiff have.
Unfortunately that is the way football is going and will only get worse if you want to succeed at the top level.
Manure fans protested about the Glazers for years with the old colour scarfs etc.,but they still get a full house every week and owners know fans will always turn up every week,no matter how farked off they feel about the owners and the changes they make.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stan_bowles View PostTimes have changed but most football fans live in the past.Cricket has moved on with name changes for one day a T20 sides without all this fuss.Football fans seem to think they have a right to live in the past when the rest of the world is in the 21st century.
Get over it.
Football is not a sport anymore it's a multi billion pound business and owners will do what they think is best to market their product,and it is a product.
I don't, and won't ever, support something that is nothing more than a business commodity, and I greatly suspect that I won't be in any sort of a minority.
The first owner of a football club, that treats that club like it was his personal fiefdom, will kill that club. Fans might, just might, grudgingly accept minor changes, but they will never accept wholesale changes that alter almost entirely their club's history and identity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostSo you'd find it acceptable if we were called QPR one season, London Rangers the next, then the London Soccer All-Stars after that, if it's about marketing? Perhaps you think it's ok if we change our kit every now and then, from hoops to plain red and then to pink?
Where would our identity and 'brand recognition' be then?
The FA will be a complete farce of an organisation if they let that gobsh1te get away with changing Hull's name."Steve, do you think 25k is a good option when there are indications that within four years, new stadiums on average have increased attendances of 60%?
For us that would mean around 29k."
QPR Richard 16-12-2013 10.08pm
Comment
Comment