tony confirms new club crest

[nuffieldranger]

Which one do you prefer then cause I have always hated the 80s one,

[DeepcutHoop]

Its inclusive of all the people who financially support the club at present

Anyone who's paid for QPRPlayer or merchandise?

Anyone who's put thousands into the club in year's passed but can't go at the moment?

Anyone who may have been supporting the club for years from abroad?

Thousands of people would be excluded, just to rule out a few ****s from other clubs mischievously voting?

The greater number of QPR fans that get a say, the fairer it is. I personally won't be too worried regardless, the new badge will be whatever it is, and it will be the QPR badge from that point.

After the last one was introduced as a fait accompli, we demanded a fan vote, and that's what we should have. Not just those who have been able to go this season.

[nuffieldranger]

What about Soldiers Ssilors and Airmsn on active duty plus sky sports have financially suported ud do they get to vote ; 0)

[vespa]

Which one do you prefer then cause I have always hated the 80s one,

70s shield for me ,mate the crest i grew up with .....

[vespa]

Anyone who's paid for QPRPlayer or merchandise?

Anyone who's put thousands into the club in year's passed but can't go at the moment?

Anyone who may have been supporting the club for years from abroad?

Thousands of people would be excluded, just to rule out a few ****s from other clubs mischievously voting?

The greater number of QPR fans that get a say, the fairer it is. I personally won't be too worried regardless, the new badge will be whatever it is, and it will be the QPR badge from that point.

After the last one was introduced as a fait accompli, we demanded a fan vote, and that's what we should have. Not just those who have been able to go this season.

Yeah all good , but there is a hierachy ( i know i cant spell) of support whether you like it or not

[QPRDave]

I'm a Twitter user, yes. Why is that relevant? You don't use Twitter, why should you be allowed an opinion on it?*

*I understand you aren't quite up to speed with the modern world, so I'll just clarify. That was sarcasm.**

**As was that

Your lack of respect for any QPR fan who isn't currently lucky enough to be able to go to games is extremely arrogant IMO.

well put deep....he's just a wum, if you look at his every stance it's the opposite of the majority....the majority are all wrong of course.
I wonder where he places the fan that subscribes to sky?...Because it's that money that goes to clubs and from what i gather is far more crucial to football clubs survival than gate money apparently.
Now we have fans who are bigger, better fans than others. Vblock doesn't go very often because of commitments, so is w12 gonna tell him to stfu about the stadium?

[vespa]

What about Soldiers Ssilors and Airmsn on active duty plus sky sports have financially suported ud do they get to vote ; 0)

No

[DeepcutHoop]

Yeah all good , but there is a hierachy ( i know i cant spell) of support whether you like it or not

For you maybe. People who go week in week out should feel privileged, not superior IMO

In things like this, it's a great chance for us all get a chance to feel like we're a part of the club we love, not start getting all defensive about who's best and who shouldn't get to have a say.

[vespa]

For you maybe. People who go week in week out should feel privileged, not superior IMO

In things like this, it's a great chance for us all get a chance to feel like we're a part of the club we love, not start getting all defensive about who's best and who shouldn't get to have a say.

Id like EVERY QPR fan to have a say but ,apart from taking into account ST, Membership, buying history how do you root out the away fans ?

[DeepcutHoop]

Id like EVERY QPR fan to have a say but ,if youve no ST, Membership, buying history how do you root the away fans ?

You don't.

As I said up the page a bit, a few petty tw*ts will hilariously try and influence it, but if there is actually enough to change the outcome, it will be obvious where the votes are coming from, and can be taken into account.

A few savvy web guys (and our media team are certainly doing everything pretty well at the moment), and it's manageable.

Or, stick one deliberately terrible option in as a decoy, and watch the p***ks wet themselves at their clever voting for that one, then discount it at the end.

[jfish]

You don't.

As I said up the page a bit, a few petty tw*ts will hilariously try and influence it, but if there is actually enough to change the outcome, it will be obvious where the votes are coming from, and can be taken into account.

A few savvy web guys (and our media team are certainly doing everything pretty well at the moment), and it's manageable.

Or, stick one deliberately terrible option in as a decoy, and watch the p***ks wet themselves at their clever voting for that one, then discount it at the end.

Would you not vote for a laugh If Chelsea or Fulham were doing the same with their badges ?

[DeepcutHoop]

Would you not vote for a laugh If Chelsea or Fulham were doing the same with their badges ?

No.

[jfish]

No.

I reckon you'd be in the minority.

[Lunar Jetman]

You don't.

As I said up the page a bit, a few petty tw*ts will hilariously try and influence it, but if there is actually enough to change the outcome, it will be obvious where the votes are coming from, and can be taken into account.

A few savvy web guys (and our media team are certainly doing everything pretty well at the moment), and it's manageable.

Or, stick one deliberately terrible option in as a decoy, and watch the p***ks wet themselves at their clever voting for that one, then discount it at the end.

Is that the same as voting Jamie Pollock as most influential person of the 20th century?

[DeepcutHoop]

I reckon you'd be in the minority.

I reckon I wouldn't.

Still doesn't affect my view that this is something that all QPR fans should have a say in.