What size stadium do you want to see and why?

[vblockranger]

if we must move then 30,000 at the most , rattling round in a 40,000 is not apealing

Same here..dont want to move but if we must then a 30k just for football and not sharing it with pop acts and Gerry Cottles circus. A stadium built for us.

[NW_Hoopz]

if we must move then 30,000 at the most , rattling round in a 40,000 is not apealing

Same here..dont want to move but if we must then a 30k .

Agreed , viva la gang of for !

[QPRDave]

Agreed , viva la gang of for !

32?....come on 32....me fav double....come on gang o 4...32k...tiny little extra 2k

[vblockranger]

Agreed , viva la gang of for !

[WCE]

43k just so that we have the biggest drum in the area and take the p1$$ out of sh1tsea for having a small ground.

[dsqpr]

I voted "don't mind" as I'm happy to leave it up to Tony and the Board to decide what size makes the most sense. One thing I will say is that it is not nice playing in a half empty stadium, so I hope that we choose a size we can fill. Personally, I think if it is done right we would get to the point fairly quickly where we could fill a 40,000 seater. There is lots of demand for football tickets in London and if we are a competitive Premier League team then we will fill a lot of seats.

[cross it Dave]

How about a stadium that changes size as required, like BC Place in Canada.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kZlyiIefMHY&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DkZlyiIefMHY

[BUSHRANGER1982]

30,000 with scope to increase size further, if needed, would be spot on.

[QPR Richard]

40k for me. A 30k would fill very quickly based on the evidence of attendance growth among other clubs. Do we want the builders in the new stadium so soon after moving in?

[BUSHRANGER1982]

I've been going down the Rangers since the early 70s, and I can only ever recall being in a 30+ thousand crowd once, Leeds in '76. I errr on the side of caution.

[vblockranger]

I voted "don't mind" as I'm happy to leave it up to Tony and the Board to decide what size makes the most sense. One thing I will say is that it is not nice playing in a half empty stadium, so I hope that we choose a size we can fill. Personally, I think if it is done right we would get to the point fairly quickly where we could fill a 40,000 seater. There is lots of demand for football tickets in London and if we are a competitive Premier League team then we will fill a lot of seats.

yer why dont we have a desk at the airport that hands out tickets as the tourists fly in? we could give them a little plastic flag to wave on the day too?

[brightonr]

yer why dont we have a desk at the airport that hands out tickets as the tourists fly in? we could give them a little plastic flag to wave on the day too?

Great idea V. See, this 40,000 isn't gonna be that hard after all.

[vblockranger]

Great idea V. See, this 40,000 isn't gonna be that hard after all.

[kron-1664]

40k. as long as they get the acoustics right for the atmosphere when its not completely full, if we are spending the money on a stadium it would be foolish to limit the size and ultiamtely the potential revenue stream.

[QPR Richard]

40k. as long as they get the acoustics right for the atmosphere when its not completely full, if we are spending the money on a stadium it would be foolish to limit the size and ultiamtely the potential revenue stream.

I agree mate. The thing I find disappointing is that this is a once in a lifetime opportunity and some people don't want to know.

If we don't do this now, we'll never get another chance. The way London is being built up there won't be anywhere else to go, unless we do what Chris Wright wanted and moved out to Uxbridge or Ruislip.