Would you rather have a severely restricted EPL or the current FPL?

[SuperHoopNik]

English. We're behind other countries in terms of youth development because our youth aren't getting the chances to play and develop in their first teams, they're having to compete with foreign players. That's why players are coming to the Championship to play first team football and improve until they're ready for the step-up to the Prem, just look at Tom Ince...if he was still at Liverpool he'd still be in the reserves and no where near the sort of player he is today.

[dsqpr]

Ok here's another question....

Would you rather England win a major tournament or keep the set up the same?

Because that's what all this boils down to. If the clubs put money before country then they'll keep it the same, and let's face it most of, if not all of the big clubs are owned by foreigner's any way they would rather keep it as it is and bring over sea's players in and make money out of their names and advertising.

If we want to win a major tournament, then there has to be a cap on the amount of foreigner's there is at a club.

For me, I would rather England won a major tournament and constantly be at the top of the world rankings.

In MLS in the USA there are very clear restrictions on the number of non-USA players a club can have. And internationally, the USA have been really improving in recent years.

[Azman]

Certainly more restrictions to get more english players in but not too extreme, also add celtic to the EPL the SPL is too ez

[loftboy]

I know it sound trivial but there is no such thing as the EPL.

[dsqpr]

I know it sound trivial but there is no such thing as the EPL.

English Premier League?

I guess you are right in saying that doesn't give the sponsor it's due but personally, I'm OK with that!