If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What a depressing way to think. I get stick for being wishy-washy on here, but I am so pleased that my mind doesn't even come close to being that lacking in empathy.
Hoping for a career-threatening injury to a young lad, just because you don't rate him, is just plain nasty.
lol all these wishy washy posts are hilarious! i bet you lot got all upset when that Bolton player swan dived as well? He's not technically rangers as he is on loan so not all that bothered and tbh i dont rate him that much anyway so we wont miss him. /shrug
lol all these wishy washy posts are hilarious! i bet you lot got all upset when that Bolton player swan dived as well? He's not technically rangers as he is on loan so not all that bothered and tbh i dont rate him that much anyway so we wont miss him. /shrug
So 'technically' you must be worried sick about Park picking up some sort of injury?
Get a life mate, can't believe as a football fan you wish a player to have picked up a major injury because YOU don't rate him. HR saw enough in Carrol to take him on loan, just like he did Townsend, who hadn't set the world alight at his other 8 loan clubs but how is he doing now ?
It's not because i don't rate him. From what i have seen he isn't good enough and we have much better options than him. He is lightweight, an average tackler, only passes backwards, loses a lot of posession. These aren't things we need when we are trying to get automatic promotion. I am sure he will be a future talent, but I want to see players playing on merit, not because of the conditions of a loan agreement, and if him being injured is the only way of us fielding our best team then as much as i feel sorry for the kid, i am happy we don;t have to play a player because of an agreement we have with another club.
It's not because i don't rate him. From what i have seen he isn't good enough and we have much better options than him. He is lightweight, an average tackler, only passes backwards, loses a lot of posession. These aren't things we need when we are trying to get automatic promotion. I am sure he will be a future talent, but I want to see players playing on merit, not because of the conditions of a loan agreement, and if him being injured is the only way of us fielding our best team then as much as i feel sorry for the kid, i am happy we don;t have to play a player because of an agreement we have with another club.
It's not because i don't rate him. From what i have seen he isn't good enough and we have much better options than him. He is lightweight, an average tackler, only passes backwards, loses a lot of posession. These aren't things we need when we are trying to get automatic promotion. I am sure he will be a future talent, but I want to see players playing on merit, not because of the conditions of a loan agreement, and if him being injured is the only way of us fielding our best team then as much as i feel sorry for the kid, i am happy we don;t have to play a player because of an agreement we have with another club.
Yer well put. Think the lad will go on to become a good player but just a bit lightweight for the Championship at the moment. We are not Spurs B team. If they want to develop the player and give him more games then why should we be forced to play him if he is not up to it? A lot of difference between Townsend's impact and young Tom's.
Last edited by vblockranger; 18-10-2013, 12:48 PM.
It's not because i don't rate him. From what i have seen he isn't good enough and we have much better options than him. He is lightweight, an average tackler, only passes backwards, loses a lot of posession. These aren't things we need when we are trying to get automatic promotion. I am sure he will be a future talent, but I want to see players playing on merit, not because of the conditions of a loan agreement, and if him being injured is the only way of us fielding our best team then as much as i feel sorry for the kid, i am happy we don;t have to play a player because of an agreement we have with another club.
So it is because you don't rate him. And also because you believe there is a clause which says he has to play. (Wasn't he left of the next starting XI after his first game?
If you did rate him would it be a different matter?
Also none of that excuses wishing a long term injury on another person IMO
So it is because you don't rate him. And also because you believe there is a clause which says he has to play. (Wasn't he left of the next starting XI after his first game?
If you did rate him would it be a different matter?
Also none of that excuses wishing a long term injury on another person IMO
Unless he plays for the Scum or Fulham or is a bit of a woofter.
So it is because you don't rate him. And also because you believe there is a clause which says he has to play. (Wasn't he left of the next starting XI after his first game?
If you did rate him would it be a different matter?
Also none of that excuses wishing a long term injury on another person IMO
to be honest it is a bit of both. If i thought he deserved to play week in/week out on merit it would be a non-issue for me. But when i think we aren't playing with our strongest starting 11 it becomes an issue for me
Comment