Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can't understand what H has against Faulin

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can't understand what H has against Faulin

    To me the last two games were tailor made for Faurlin ,we played 4-5-1 yet for the 1st half Brighton had 50% of the midfield , 5 across the middle yet we still gave them room , Faurlin closes players down tackles and still can find a pass he made more tackles against Sheffield wed than anybody else in all the games since

  • #2
    Who would you have dropped to accomodate Faurlin?

    Comment


    • #3
      The Faurlin before his injury i agree.....the Faurlin after his injury i wouldnt have played either.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Lunar Jetman View Post
        Who would you have dropped to accomodate Faurlin?
        Although I think Henry played very well, Ale can do all that he does & some quite easily. Ale & Barton as the 2 holding midfielders with the 4 attacking players (Niko, Hoilett, Phillips & Austin?) ahead of em.
        You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by vblockranger View Post
          The Faurlin before his injury i agree.....the Faurlin after his injury i wouldnt have played either.
          Shef wed Barton and Faulin paired very well took full control of the m/f

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Lunar Jetman View Post
            Who would you have dropped to accomodate Faurlin?
            O niell ?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by hooploft View Post
              O niell ?
              Thought O'Neil worked his balls off.

              Comment


              • #8
                Yep I rate O'Niel also rate Hendry but not before Faulin there are horses for courses and imo we missed faulin in the last 2 game I always believe to win games you have to win the mid field more often than not

                Comment


                • #9
                  We've tried playing Faurlin to death. We'd have been a worse team last night with him. MK Dons? Swindon? Enough said.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Faurlin has had his day.
                    For me, Swindon was the game he needed to dominate in order to get back into serous contention. He didn't, he failed miserably in fact. He'd be lucky to make the subs bench were it left up to me.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X