Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'lucky' lucciano becchio..........

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 'lucky' lucciano becchio..........

    i tell thee..........watch this space!
    you know nothing john snow!!!!

  • #2
    would like it if true, aint he only been at norwich a year though?

    Comment


    • #3
      yes but 'unhappy' sitting on the crunchers bench.....word is him n ali faurlin are quite 'close'!
      you know nothing john snow!!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Factamondo View Post
        yes but 'unhappy' sitting on the crunchers bench.....word is him n ali faurlin are quite 'close'!
        Faurlin to Norwich then
        Football played the Charlie Ferris way

        Comment


        • #5
          Not what we need he's another centre forward we need a number 10 type ball playing striker/attacking midfielder.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by cowleyhoop View Post
            Not what we need he's another centre forward we need a number 10 type ball playing striker/attacking midfielder.
            You mean a playmaker.
            Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by QPR Richard View Post
              You mean a playmaker.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by DeepcutHoop View Post
                Is that the best you can do, resorting to silly little video clips?

                Grow up eh?
                Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by QPR Richard View Post
                  Is that the best you can do, resorting to silly little video clips?

                  Grow up eh?
                  You could just have let the number 10 reference go just once.

                  He knew what he meant, you knew what he meant, everyone knows what it means.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by DeepcutHoop View Post
                    You could just have let the number 10 reference go just once.

                    He knew what he meant, you knew what he meant, everyone knows what it means.
                    You obviously missed all the other stuff that went with it, so I'll repeat it for your benefit:

                    a number 10 type ball playing striker/attacking midfielder.

                    Sounds like a playmaker to me....
                    Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by QPR Richard View Post
                      You obviously missed all the other stuff that went with it, so I'll repeat it for your benefit:

                      a number 10 type ball playing striker/attacking midfielder.

                      Sounds like a playmaker to me....
                      Yes. To me too.

                      Not sure why every time the number ten role gets mentioned, someone has to correct it.

                      Not sure if it's always you (and apologies for my testiness if it isn't), but someone always does and it's silly..

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by DeepcutHoop View Post
                        Yes. To me too.

                        Not sure why every time the number ten role gets mentioned, someone has to correct it.

                        Not sure if it's always you (and apologies for my testiness if it isn't), but someone always does and it's silly..
                        Well let me enlighten you, it's me. It just seems a bit daft calling it such a role when the bloke who's been allocated the shirt this season has done the off. You won't see a QPR player in a number ten shirt this season.

                        But anyway, let's leave it there. Some may prefer to call the position number ten, I prefer to use the term playmaker.
                        Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by QPR Richard View Post
                          Well let me enlighten you, it's me. It just seems a bit daft calling it such a role when the bloke who's been allocated the shirt this season has done the off. You won't see a QPR player in a number ten shirt this season.

                          But anyway, let's leave it there. Some may prefer to call the position number ten, I prefer to use the term playmaker.
                          I know. You said. It's relentlessly pointless to correct people though. Because we all know it.

                          Edit: I realise on reading that back, that there is some level of irony.

                          But you started it. Ner.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by QPR Richard View Post
                            You obviously missed all the other stuff that went with it, so I'll repeat it for your benefit:

                            a number 10 type ball playing striker/attacking midfielder.

                            Sounds like a playmaker to me....
                            No what i ment was a forward who can drop back into midfield 5 not a playmaker. I love it when people just try to be smart for the sake of it.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by cowleyhoop View Post
                              No what i ment was a forward who can drop back into midfield 5 not a playmaker. I love it when people just try to be smart for the sake of it.
                              It's "meant".
                              You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X