Scott Parker - To Fulham

[BUSHRANGER1982]

Crafty bleeder, waited until the fools had whittled away the points needed to survive, to 37.
No flies on a winner like Scott Parker, eh?

[rickyranger]

Woulda been a great signing but hey ho, life goes on, won't lose any sleep over it.

Agree with West & tw in that Foolham have the makings of a half decent side this year, don't think they'll be in any relegation scrap.

As they say time will tell but not sure all their signings will improve their team spirit something that caused us some problems last year!

[californiahoop]

A 3 year contract at his age and with his injury record? Fulham must be mad.

He defo would have improved the strength in depth of our side - but not by enough to justify that!

Next............



Ps. Facto lives!

Ditto

[QPRDave]

WHAT!!!!!!!!...this can't be right .....he's going to sign for us

[Fordy]

Good. Now lets go after some realistic targets at a better age.

[QPR Richard]

That's twice he's knocked us back. F*ck him.

[swede]

Good news.

[Timmy the Doc]

Gutted we didn't get him. Would have been a great signing.

[yugohoop]

Never a realistic target.

[Connell10]

Im really not bothered that we didnt sign him, i think we may have dodge a bullet there!

[stanistheman]

a decent midfielder but not really needed. now let us see QPR sign more needed players such we CBs and strikers.
and keeping Barton and Faurlin is a must.

[casuallyqpr]

thank **** for that!!!!!

[LoftusRoadLad]

Fulham have done seem decent business and got off to a solid start winning away (not something they are known for) so could be a relatively comfortable season ahead for them

Pity not many saw the game !

[QPR Richard]

Well, Mr Parker has swerved us twice now so bow larks to him and let's find someone else.

I want us to sort out our defence before we do anything else.

[Shepherds Mush]

Parker would have been a good signing but we need a CB, LB and Striker more than another CM, so theres no real loss IMO