Am I the only one who think they should not play together as both are defensive midfielders? I think the other midfielder should be attacking one like Jenas at least for home games.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Faurlin and Henry
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by zeberdee View PostIf you wanted to chane it I would swap the positions of Barton and Faurlin from yesterday and play probably O'Neil as the other CM. The best CM would be Barton + Parker imo - but fat chance of that.QPR fan since1987
@yousef_qpr
Comment
-
-
henry didnt put himself about enough for me. faurlin offers abit defensively but his talent is linking midfield and attack with slick passing.
I'd rather Derry in the middle as yesterday our weakpoint was down the middle.Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
Lovejoy: "No?!"
Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"
Please Follow My Twitter
Comment
-
Henry was poor yesterday. Passing was mediocre. Tackling too. What type of a player is he? Need a CM who can carry the ball and create options and another who can break up play. Both need to hustle and outmuscle the opposition. Thought Henry and Faurlin failed to do either as a pairing. Parker plus one of them would be superb. If not Parker then we need to get someone else. Granero's not up to the job in 442. Barton's better on the right, so ought nail that position if, as I hope, he stays.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Yousef View PostAm I the only one who think they should not play together as both are defensive midfielders? I think the other midfielder should be attacking one like Jenas at least for home games.
Comment
Comment