I've watched them both 5 times and neither were pens. Traore doesn't touch the man and he goes down, then the other one dives over Barton. What annoys me is weds fans moaning about it and Dave Jones and then those 2 idiots on highlight show agree!! They are NEVER penalties!!! I would be the first to say when we got away with something
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Neither were penalties
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Rich View PostI've watched them both 5 times and neither were pens. Traore doesn't touch the man and he goes down, then the other one dives over Barton. What annoys me is weds fans moaning about it and Dave Jones and then those 2 idiots on highlight show agree!! They are NEVER penalties!!! I would be the first to say when we got away with something
Comment
-
After watching the incidents on the tv I would say we dodged a bullet as the second was certainly a possible.
However, the but, when you hit the ground in the manner there players did both inside and outside the penalty area they had already influenced the referee in the wrong way.
Tough luck Dave Jones, always a moaner, stop the diving and then you may have a case!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rich View PostI've watched them both 5 times and neither were pens. Traore doesn't touch the man and he goes down, then the other one dives over Barton. What annoys me is weds fans moaning about it and Dave Jones and then those 2 idiots on highlight show agree!! They are NEVER penalties!!! I would be the first to say when we got away with something
The bottom line is we deserved to win yesterday based on possession and clear cut chances created, and if anyone thinks different then they are deluded or have their own agenda. Their keeper was superb and kept them in it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 3London View PostIf they were the other way round we would be saying both were stonewall penalties. Last season in the prem , beach ball refs like dowd would have given both and 2 red cards
Got tv monitors above me in Platters , neither looked like penalties to me when we watched the replays back. Second one when he got booked was embarassing to watch , was going dowmn before contact made
Comment
-
I thought the first one the guy was falling down before he got touched. If he had stayed on his feet he would have got his shot away, but Green would have closed down the angel as he let the ball run away from him. The second. Barton IMO did touch him and could have been given 50/50, but what went against him was that he did not even try to stay on his feet (I think he would have done as Barton was pulling away his leg), he when down like he had been shot.
The pundits don't help, by saying they were both touched and then had the right to go down, as they are wrong no you dont. You should stay on your feet and long as possible as it is not a non-contact sport.
Saying that, if they were the other way round i would have claimed any of them. :DOne for all.... and all for one
Comment
-
Originally posted by W12_Ranger View PostThis.
Got tv monitors above me in Platters , neither looked like penalties to me when we watched the replays back. Second one when he got booked was embarassing to watch , was going dowmn before contact made
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeepcutHoop View PostThey showed the replay just now on Goals on Sunday. Definite contact. The theatrical fall worked in our favour.
And if there is contact but not enough for a player to lose his balance and fall, then it's not a foul.
More referees need to have the guts to give yellows for simulation. That is the only way to stamp out the disease on our game.
Its all very well for Jones to bleat on, but how much does he tell his players not to cheat by trying to con referees? But he still has the gall to lay into them like he did yesterday.
Comment
Comment