Originally posted by qpr4life
View Post
Joon -
I am not one to criticise your passion for a player as Im generally the same with certain members and the CLUB as a whole.
But, to remind you mate. This is a forum to discuss and to give out individual opinions, some comments can occasionally go too far and personal and for that I understand the need be annoyed.
But to be offended that people find your posts maybe boring or wrong is probably a tad ridiculous and for that reason this may not be the right place for you.
This forum is for QPR fans, we support QPR and follow QPR no matter the problems and league.
As QPR fans we do not care for individual players, we care for passion and unity. We have always been known as a family club and the changes recently made have been huge for us.
1 player doesnt make a team, in particular there was big hopes for Park because as you quite rightly said, he could still have been part of the United setup last season.
NOW, correct me if im wrong.. BUT most of us on here are telling you THAT PARK is no longer a good player. The proof is, that if he was still good enough for United then why the hell couldnt he put a shift in for QPR??
You can go round the houses explaining how PARK has the FINAL decision in his career, but the reason for this is due to what most people call 'A contract' This contract is kept for a certain period of time, and for Park it wasnt due up at QPR. (therfore he had every right to stay..)
QPR have EVERY right to KEEP park regardless of him asking for a transfer request etc. (Therefore this is not DOWN to him)
We feel he is not worthy, needed or valuable enough for QPR no longer and for how much he costs we feel its better to get rid. And by all accounts, thats what is happening.
Another example
Barton - We have every right to keep him, which we have so far until someone meets an agreement.
If we SELL or Release Barton, it is the CLUBS decision. Surely?
You cannot get angry by people telling you that Park has not been a good player, we quite frankly he hasnt. Park had one good game, which was Southampton Away and credit to him for that.
Out of all the players last season IMO Park, Bosingwa, Samba, Hoillet and Granero failed to impress and meet up to their so called big reputations.
I would say everyone else offered at least something more, whether it be passion, goals or in general playing better throughout.
E.g. Mackie was better than Park. Mbia was better than Park. Remy was FAR better than Park. Cesar was better than park. HILL AND Nelson showed more passion and the way to be captains.
To finish, Park isnt QPR. He is a marketing figure.
We support QPR not Park, but if he stays with us then I will get behind him like the other ten members on the field for us.
If Park leaves QPR and we dont see you posting on here any longer, then it will prove HUGE points that you are only here for one reason. Proving that PARK served his need.
Thanks
I am not one to criticise your passion for a player as Im generally the same with certain members and the CLUB as a whole.
But, to remind you mate. This is a forum to discuss and to give out individual opinions, some comments can occasionally go too far and personal and for that I understand the need be annoyed.
But to be offended that people find your posts maybe boring or wrong is probably a tad ridiculous and for that reason this may not be the right place for you.
This forum is for QPR fans, we support QPR and follow QPR no matter the problems and league.
As QPR fans we do not care for individual players, we care for passion and unity. We have always been known as a family club and the changes recently made have been huge for us.
1 player doesnt make a team, in particular there was big hopes for Park because as you quite rightly said, he could still have been part of the United setup last season.
NOW, correct me if im wrong.. BUT most of us on here are telling you THAT PARK is no longer a good player. The proof is, that if he was still good enough for United then why the hell couldnt he put a shift in for QPR??
You can go round the houses explaining how PARK has the FINAL decision in his career, but the reason for this is due to what most people call 'A contract' This contract is kept for a certain period of time, and for Park it wasnt due up at QPR. (therfore he had every right to stay..)
QPR have EVERY right to KEEP park regardless of him asking for a transfer request etc. (Therefore this is not DOWN to him)
We feel he is not worthy, needed or valuable enough for QPR no longer and for how much he costs we feel its better to get rid. And by all accounts, thats what is happening.
Another example
Barton - We have every right to keep him, which we have so far until someone meets an agreement.
If we SELL or Release Barton, it is the CLUBS decision. Surely?
You cannot get angry by people telling you that Park has not been a good player, we quite frankly he hasnt. Park had one good game, which was Southampton Away and credit to him for that.
Out of all the players last season IMO Park, Bosingwa, Samba, Hoillet and Granero failed to impress and meet up to their so called big reputations.
I would say everyone else offered at least something more, whether it be passion, goals or in general playing better throughout.
E.g. Mackie was better than Park. Mbia was better than Park. Remy was FAR better than Park. Cesar was better than park. HILL AND Nelson showed more passion and the way to be captains.
To finish, Park isnt QPR. He is a marketing figure.
We support QPR not Park, but if he stays with us then I will get behind him like the other ten members on the field for us.
If Park leaves QPR and we dont see you posting on here any longer, then it will prove HUGE points that you are only here for one reason. Proving that PARK served his need.
Thanks
Comment