Is the 'Harry Out' Bandwagon starting to roll quicker?

[Hitman34]

least i'm consistent. I have no problem if you (the majority) trust him and think he is good for QPR. I dont and i think years from now we may rue the day that Fernandes ever set foot in Loftus Road.

i dont particularly agree with this comment but i see where your coming from.

I also have never bought the **** about tango and cash being this evil double act.

in my opinion tango and cash saved us from ruin, pumped money into the club and got us promoted twice. they steered us into the prem league along with help from amit and co.

as for people on here moaning that they never gave warnkock money to spend when we were promoted i say this to you lot....................

would you spend money on your house if you found a potentional buyer?

would i want them back now, no. They came with a poupose to get us into the prem, which they delivered end of.
fernandes came with the pourpose of stability in the prem, which he has failed horribly.

if i had to choose out of harry or tony as to who should go, i would choose harry.

poyet is there for the taking, go get him now tony.

as for the bridge deal, i was told he wanted £20k flat, was offered 8k plus 6k on apperance fee.

any truth in that?

[SuperHoopNik]

TheSourceFooty, some believe him some don't, he's said this: "For the record Fernandes + Beard did not block the Bridge transfer.They did put a limit on wage, length, singing on fee and agent's fee #qpr"

[vblockranger]

TheSourceFooty, some believe him some don't, he's said this: "For the record Fernandes + Beard did not block the Bridge transfer.They did put a limit on wage, length, singing on fee and agent's fee #qpr"

Horse bolted and halfway to the next town

[West London is Rss]

Poyet is 100% a man that could lead us into the Prem and keep us there with his style and modern methods.
Harry is getting on a bit, for stability surely a young manager is the man. I thought Harry's job was purely to try keeping us up?
Or at least i thought it was.

[stainrodisalegend]

Horse bolted and halfway to the next town

Not sure Bridge has "bolted" anywhere in at least a decade, other than to the golf course. Hobbled maybe...

[QPRDave]

All the 'Arry out boys will be crying in their beers when Cotterill or Pulis get the job

[vblockranger]

All the 'Arry out boys will be crying in their beers when Cotterill or Pulis get the job

"but for stability surely a young manager is the man"

[QPRDave]

TheSourceFooty, some believe him some don't, he's said this: "For the record Fernandes + Beard did not block the Bridge transfer.They did put a limit on wage, length, singing on fee and agent's fee #qpr"

Not bad if true i have to say. I was getting a bit annoyed that TF and PB were interfering in transfers, but if this is the case although Harry needs to make decisions on playing staff in my view, these parameters seem
a very good idea

[vblockranger]

Not sure Bridge has "bolted" anywhere in at least a decade, other than to the golf course. Hobbled maybe...

lol you have a point :-)

[QPRDave]

"but for stability surely a young manager is the man"

Yeah exactly V...

[DouDou_87]

Redknapp is short term in every way, with the sole intention of promotion at the first attempt. But does anyone really see that happening? Do they really see us going straight back up? The club that does NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING the easy/straightforward way.

We talk about stability, but we will never have that with Redknapp IMO.

TF & PB either stick with Harry and back him to try and achieve short term gains. Or appoint Poyet, Birch/Gallen or someone else on a 3 year deal and genuinely get some stability.

[DouDou_87]

For the record- glad we didn't get Bridge- Bosingwa mk 2 and plenty of better alternatives out there.

[West London is Rss]

Hardly doubt Coterrill or Pulis would get the QPR job.
Obviously some people dont see the benefit of a young manager nowadays.
Nor that alot of clubs with a manager over the age of 60 are sacking them for a younger manager with modern coaching techniques.

[West London is Rss]

Redknapp is short term in every way, with the sole intention of promotion at the first attempt. But does anyone really see that happening? Do they really see us going straight back up? The club that does NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING the easy/straightforward way.

We talk about stability, but we will never have that with Redknapp IMO.

TF & PB either stick with Harry and back him to try and achieve short term gains. Or appoint Poyet, Birch/Gallen or someone else on a 3 year deal and genuinely get some stability.

Some sense being spoken there!.. Well said.
Give youth a chance haha

[vblockranger]

Some sense being spoken there!.. Well said.
Give youth a chance haha

Well we gave Trevor Francis the job and look how that turned out :-) reckon that was probably before your time tho young fella