Originally posted by MYU
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sky Sports New Just Tweeted
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ollyhoops View PostHas he really spent £58m? wow.... when you think of it, we would be really lucky to recoup £7m tbh. It just shows how out of control the spending became and we didn't buy a single youngster. Now we can see why QPR failed so badly.
We just seemed to sleep walk into spending, or at least i did. Just heard figures being bandied about in the windows and thought nothing of it, but when you see it listed in front of you, it sinks in.
QPR have never paid these sums before. Amazing!
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPRDave View PostI saw the interview at 5 thought it was pretty fair tbh.... He has backed the managers to the tune of £58 mill, and has stated he hasn't got involved in player recruitment so we have to believe him unless someone comes out with proof to the contrary ..ie NW MH or HR
Where's the proof? Where's the evidence? We have to go by what we're told unless there's evidence to say otherwise.Supporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostTony has said he hasn't got involved in the transfers of players brought in, none of the three managers we've had since he came to the club have said a word about this, yet there are those on here who believe Tony made the buying decisions.
Where's the proof? Where's the evidence? We have to go by what we're told unless there's evidence to say otherwise.You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MattyRangers View PostThere's even proof AGAINST it (ie Hughes stating himself that he jumped at the chance to buy park) but the conspiracy theorists still reckon it's TF buying emSupporting QPR isn't just about a football team. It's about roots and identity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPRDave View PostI saw the interview at 5 thought it was pretty fair tbh.... He has backed the managers to the tune of £58 mill, and has stated he hasn't got involved in player recruitment so we have to believe him unless someone comes out with proof to the contrary ..ie NW MH or HR
Comment
-
Originally posted by vblockranger View Post£58 million! wow..no wonder the media are portraying him as some kind of numpty! To spend £58 million and end up with a worse team than when you started is some kind of job! lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPR Richard View PostTony has said he hasn't got involved in the transfers of players brought in, none of the three managers we've had since he came to the club have said a word about this, yet there are those on here who believe Tony made the buying decisions.
Where's the proof? Where's the evidence? We have to go by what we're told unless there's evidence to say otherwise.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MattyRangers View PostThere's even proof AGAINST it (ie Hughes stating himself that he jumped at the chance to buy park) but the conspiracy theorists still reckon it's TF buying em
Some fans are genuinely mental.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DouDou_87 View PostFollow @ficklefootball on Twitter- he loves a conspiracy theory about the club. Absolutely convinced Fernandes made the majority of the signings last summer.
Some fans are genuinely mental.
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPRDave View Postis this where all this c**p is coming from? ....posters reading some faceless wannabe starting rumours?
He's quiet as a mouse when we win or anything good happens and seems to absolutely love it when we mess up in any way. The posts some **** about TF or something.
We've got some strange 'fans'.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MYU View PostThats why we didn't sign Bridge maybe?
They listened to the wrong people last time and doing things different now, or are you saying those players were Tony's signing, not the managers?
I think ideally we need a football person who knows football business like David Dein involved in the club as he is a respected football mover and shaker
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by NW9_RANGER View Postmakes me laugh, right now I'd say some of our fans are more of a joke than the actual club is and that's saying something. End of the day how many of you were saying TF shouldn't have let Mark Hughes sign this player and that player on this and that? So hold on.... now a manager wants to sign a player who will be 33 when the season starts... is a very good mate of SWP (worrying to say the least) and was happy to stay at man city all these years and collect big dough (fair play to him) rather than sign for a team, TF is in the wrong again??? He played well at Brighton but you bring players like Wayne Bridge in to this type of dressing room we already have - It's a recipe for more disaster. If ric says they insulted wayne bridge with that contract, then good! HR wanted to make him an offer so the club obliged but they don't want this type of player so made sure that if and when this signing back fired they wouldn't be hurt financially.
I applaud TF and the board.
If Harry wanted this player then he should be asking Tony's questions NOT the other way round.
Many want to say we're a joke of a club but this says we ARE learning from our lessons!I played sunday league football today.
Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.
I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.
We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!
Comment
Comment