Originally posted by Rich
View Post
You can blame all of the above in one way or another. If you carefully analyse it though I only come up with one answer. Mark Hughes.
Briatore creates a media frenzy about the way he interfered in team affairs and the lack of money he gave the previous managers. They also, rightly, bang on about how many managers he hired and fired in a short space of time and how this hindered our promotion chances over a period of 3/4 seasons. So the media and Briatore are to blame for the past and for planting a seed for the new owners to know how NOT to run the club under the new regime.
Fernandes comes in and is completely different in his approach to the way he deals with everyone. He's immediately friendly, enthusiastic & genuine. He doesn't want to make the same mistakes as Briatore and Ecclestone and you can bet your bottom dollar Amit had plenty of horror stories to tell Tony as well. So he sticks with Warnock as we kick off our Premier League 2011/12 season and decides to bring in Hughes when Warnock's results and perhaps "motivation only" skills seem a little better suited to the Championship. It's a gamble but it just about pays off for that season. He backs his man and Hughes buys the wrong players. No centre backs meaning Hill and Nelsen play every game, ageing money grabbers and a lack of plan B, let alone plan A means he fails. He sticks with his man for too long but having fired Warnock 11/12 months earlier doesn't want to look like another Briatore. Harry comes in, gambles on a goal scorer and a decent CB that was clear for all to see we needed back in August and we go down anyway.
Who's fault was it for bringing in ageing money grabbers? Hughes
Who's fault was it for not bringing in any centre backs? Hughes
Who's fault was it for not bringing in a good goal scorer? Hughes
Who's fault was it hiring a manager without any character? Fernandes
Who's fault was it that Tony stuck with Hughes too long? Briatore
Who convinced the board the days of Vine and Aygemang would be long gone and players he would bring in on long contracts would be worth it? Hughes and Rigg
Who's to blame? Hughes.
Briatore creates a media frenzy about the way he interfered in team affairs and the lack of money he gave the previous managers. They also, rightly, bang on about how many managers he hired and fired in a short space of time and how this hindered our promotion chances over a period of 3/4 seasons. So the media and Briatore are to blame for the past and for planting a seed for the new owners to know how NOT to run the club under the new regime.
Fernandes comes in and is completely different in his approach to the way he deals with everyone. He's immediately friendly, enthusiastic & genuine. He doesn't want to make the same mistakes as Briatore and Ecclestone and you can bet your bottom dollar Amit had plenty of horror stories to tell Tony as well. So he sticks with Warnock as we kick off our Premier League 2011/12 season and decides to bring in Hughes when Warnock's results and perhaps "motivation only" skills seem a little better suited to the Championship. It's a gamble but it just about pays off for that season. He backs his man and Hughes buys the wrong players. No centre backs meaning Hill and Nelsen play every game, ageing money grabbers and a lack of plan B, let alone plan A means he fails. He sticks with his man for too long but having fired Warnock 11/12 months earlier doesn't want to look like another Briatore. Harry comes in, gambles on a goal scorer and a decent CB that was clear for all to see we needed back in August and we go down anyway.
Who's fault was it for bringing in ageing money grabbers? Hughes
Who's fault was it for not bringing in any centre backs? Hughes
Who's fault was it for not bringing in a good goal scorer? Hughes
Who's fault was it hiring a manager without any character? Fernandes
Who's fault was it that Tony stuck with Hughes too long? Briatore
Who convinced the board the days of Vine and Aygemang would be long gone and players he would bring in on long contracts would be worth it? Hughes and Rigg
Who's to blame? Hughes.
Comment