Tweet
I saw the other post on this, the way I see it its another example of a fair minded player being judged differently, had Hill thrown himself to the floor clutching his chest / face it may have resulted in a different outcome.
One of the things that also frustrates is a player staying up right when fouled in the penalty area the rev plays advantage and when no goal the ref does not take the play back all the commentators praise the player for his fairness but it has actually harmed the team (less Adel or Remy take the resulting penalty............kidding!)
Lastly over acting (remember when it was called that much better phrase than simulation) should be subject to after match review, the referee has to stop play just in case there is an injury, it has to stop, it's cheating of the highest order, it stops play, hinders attacks, forces throw ins....... It's agony to watch, match bans for players points deductions for persistent offending clubs (bans for clubs with large squads is no big deal)
Radical I know but then again..................
I still believe.
One of the things that also frustrates is a player staying up right when fouled in the penalty area the rev plays advantage and when no goal the ref does not take the play back all the commentators praise the player for his fairness but it has actually harmed the team (less Adel or Remy take the resulting penalty............kidding!)
Lastly over acting (remember when it was called that much better phrase than simulation) should be subject to after match review, the referee has to stop play just in case there is an injury, it has to stop, it's cheating of the highest order, it stops play, hinders attacks, forces throw ins....... It's agony to watch, match bans for players points deductions for persistent offending clubs (bans for clubs with large squads is no big deal)
Radical I know but then again..................
I still believe.